Topica Email List Directory

Welcome Guest!

Detaxarchive

	Previous Message	All Messages	Next Message

USA - The Law: Judges Being Secretly Trained To Resist Constitution	sand-@wwdb.org
	Jun 04, 2003 19:27 PDT

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C32ABE.9DD2DA20
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

-----Original Message-----
From: Ted
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:16 PM

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: FWJudges Being
Secretly Trained To Resist Constitution
 Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 11:19:00 -0700
 From: Sam Bournefree <sam_bour-@mail2world.com>

From: Larry Russell
Subj: Judges Being Secretly Trained To Resist Constitution

I think that this is a subject that we should look into as
it impacts every aspect of our work.

J.A.I.L. News Journal
____________________________________________________________
________
Los Angeles, California

May 11, 2003

Judges Being Secretly Trained

To Resist Arguments Based on Constitution

Fearful of growing backlash from the public against
arbitrary, prejudiced, and even malicious judgments that are
protected by judicial immunity, judges have banded together
under government sponsorship to devise means of defending
themselves from aggrieved and increasingly militant pro se
litigants.

------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------

Continuing Education Credit Prejudices Judges

by June Wisniewski

The Anti-Government Movement Handbook is a training manual
for judges and court staff against pro se litigants,
published in 1999 by the National Center for the State
Courts (NCSC) in Williamsburg, Virginia. This book, along
with Dealing With Common Law Courts: A Model Curriculum for
Judges and Court Staff, published in 1997 by NCSC, was
developed from an Institute for Course Management (ICM)
course on dealing with common law courts, held in
Scottsdale, Arizona, February 5-7, 1997.

The curriculum and manuals for this course were prepared
with a grant from the State Justice Institute: Award No.
SJI-96-02B-B-159, The Rise of Common Law Courts in the
United States: An Examination of the Movement, the Potential
Impact on the Judiciary, and How the States Could Respond.
The State Justice Institute (SJI) is a non-profit, 501C(3)
corporation that was started in 1986 and funded by Congress
to develop courses and training manuals for state courts and
judicial training organizations.

This course and training manuals were developed by a group
of 27 judges, court clerks, court administrators, and
prosecutors in Arizona who examined the history and
procedures of the Common Law Court Movement (CLC) and
created the training curriculum and responses that courts,
judges, and court administrators can use when dealing with
common law courts in their own jurisdictions. My contact at
the conference said that one of its goals was to identify
ways the courts can make preemptive strikes against the CLC
movement.

Some of the keynote speakers who helped produce the CLC
course in Arizona were Chief Justice Thomas Moyer of
Columbus, Ohio, T.C. Brown of Columbus, Ohio (a reporter for
the Cleveland Plain Dealer), and Jonathan Mozzochi,
Executive Director of the Coalition for Human Dignity in
Seattle, Washington. Mozzochi, who distributed Guns and
Gavels, a publication of the Coalition, was listed as
"nationally recognized expert on militias and hate group
activity." The Coalition is like a west coast version of
the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).

I originally found out about this course by watching a
videotaped session of the 1996 combined conference of the
Conference of Chief Justices (CCJ) and the Conference of
State Court Administrators (COSCA), held in Nashville,
Tennessee in the summer of 1996 and called Impact of the
Common Law Court Movement on the Courts. More than 50 state
Supreme Court justices and state court administrators
attended the Tennessee conference. The CLC session was taped
with a grant from SJI. Keynote speakers were Michael
Reynolds, senior intelligence analyst for the SPLC, and
James Reynolds, chief of the Terrorism and Violent Crime
Section, U.S. Department of Justice.

The panel discussion included Susan Hansen, senior reporter
with American Lawyer, Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice
Thomas Moyer (past president of CCJ), Utah Supreme Court
Justice Michael Zimmerman, and Judges Jeffrey Langton and
Gregory Mohr from Montana. The taped session was more than
three hours long. At the end of the session, one of the
speakers mentioned that there was funding for additional CLC
conferences. I immediately called ICM, located at NCSC in
Virginia, and asked about the additional CLC conferences. My
contact told me that a Scottsdale conference was going to
take place in about three days. Since those two conferences,
there have been additional conferences sponsored by SJI with
other organizations.

SJI sponsored a conference with the American Judicature
Society in Scottsdale, Arizona in November, 1999 that was
closed to the public and the press. There will also be an
ICM course in Orlando, Florida on February 5-7, 2001 called
Increasing Access to Justice for Pro Se Litigants, with that
organization's perception of what access means.

Constitutionalists in Court was held in the St.
Paul-Minneapolis, Minnesota area in the summer of 2000 by
the National Judicial College (NJC) of Reno, Nevada, and the
same course was held again November 13-14, 2000, also at NJC
in Reno. This course discusses the history of protest
movements affecting the judiciary, identifies typical
challenges and ways to handle them, anticipates courtroom
security needs, and plans solutions and strategies.

NJC, together with the University of Nevada, Reno (UNR),
conducted a survey, developed material for their courses
from SJI materials and grants, and published a brief report
called Right-Wing Extremist Challenges to the Authority and
Jurisdiction of the Court in 1998. This course and report
contains a preemptive plan against pro se litigants and
others who may disagree with the court, including the
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Native American
protest groups, religious organizations, and anyone else who
may take issue with a court decision. The information from
NJC is so controversial that NJC has banned its course and
conference materials from the public, but their library and
the SJI repository is open to the public.

I originally started researching judicial training
organizations in 1996 after I was denied an inheritance by
the New Jersey court system when my parents died and was
also denied entrance to a conference and course materials at
NJC in May, 1996, called The National Conference on the
Media and the Courts: Working Together to Serve the American
People. The media conference was closed to the public. Only
one New Jersey judge, Martin Kravarick, attended that
conference. Judge Kravarick was elected president of the
American Judges Association (AJA), a judge's organization
under NCSC. AJA publishes a quarterly journal called Court
Review, available in your local law library, by
subscription, or through interlibrary loan.

I first found out about the judicial movement against pro se
litigants and the CLC movement by reading Kravarick's
President's Message in the Fall, 1996 issue of Court Review.
I called Judge Kravarick for more information on what the
CLC movement was all about, and he gave me some additional
contact information. I called Mike Reynolds of SPLC, and he
told me there were four conference proceedings and that the
conference was taped. I waited over three months to get a
copy of the tape, Impact of the Common Law Movement on the
Courts. That tape is available through interlibrary loan
from NCSC along with the training manuals mentioned above.

Each state has an SJI repository for all publications put
out by the organizations they have funded. For example, the
repository in Nevada is at NJC in Reno. In New Jersey, the
SJI repository is at the New Jersey State Library in
Trenton. You can check out these training manuals with a New
Jersey library card. You can also find out where your SJI
repository is by looking it up on the Internet at
http://www.statejustice.org, by calling SJI at 703-684-6100,
or by writing to the State Justice Institute, 1650 King
street, Alexandria, VA� 22314.

SJI is funded by Congress with your tax dollars. If you
don't like the courses and materials they are funding, you
can write to your senator or congressman, or directly to SJI
and ask them to stop funding these materials. SJI gets very
few letters from the public, and I'm sure they would love to
hear from you. When you get to their Web site, read and
download the newsletters. Most of their new grants are in
their newsletters.

The National Center for State Courts is an umbrella
organization for several judges' organizations such as the
National College of Probate judges (NCPJ), AJA, CCJ, COSCA,
ICM and others. I have been a member of NCPJ since 1996 and
have attended four judges' conferences. The most
controversial and harmful material against the public is
coming from NJC and NCSC materials, two agencies that
compete with each other for SJI and federal government
funding.

In the training manuals mentioned above, there are two
sections in each book where the writers advise judges and
court personnel such as court clerks and guards on how to
handle pro se litigants using a step-by-step process. The
writers of these manuals reveal a court that is biased and
has a dangerous point of view about justice and equal access
in the court system.

Copyright © 2001 June Wisniewski

------------------------------------------------------------
--------

The Author:� June Wisniewski is a legal researcher and
journalist in Reno, Nevada, who can be reached at
reno-@judicialterrorism.com.� She has written a number
of articles on judicial subjects and is author of the book,
The Coffin Chasers: An Aggrieved Litigant's Journey Through
the Corrupt World of Probate.� This article appeared in the
January 5, 2001 issue of the Idaho Observer and is reprinted
here with knowledge of the author.� Its subject matter is
the basis of another book, Unequal Justice: The Inside Story
of the National Judicial College.

------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------

The judicial system is fighting every Constitutional
argument imaginable that they see� threatening� their�
tyrannical empire. However, they just have not� figured out
how to resist the rising national movement of JAIL4Judges.
This became apparent when a California judge took� special
note on the record� of this organization, stating that this
organization� sends out thousands� of email messages against
the judiciary all over the country, and that he too receives
them, but does not read them.

The power of J.A.I.L. lies in the fact that it is not based
upon a legal argument made before a judge in a courtroom, to
which the judges could be trained to resist, but rather in
passing a constitutional amendment outside the court's power
by a vote of the people.

J.A.I.L. is an acronym for Judicial Accountability
Initiative Law
JAIL's very informative website is found at
www.jail4judges.org
JAIL proposes a unique new addition to our form of
government.
JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY
hope!
JAIL is spreading across America like a fast moving
wildfire!
JAIL is making inroads into Congress for federal
accountability!
JAIL may be supported at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA
91603
To subscribe or be removed:� AddRe-@jail4judges.org
E-Groups, sign on at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
Forum to make your voice heard JAIL-So-@yahoogroups.com
Ask not what J.A.I.L. can do for me, but ask what I can do
for J.A.I.L.

"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an
irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's
minds.." - Samuel Adams

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is
striking at the root." -- Henry David Thoreau

------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C32ABE.9DD2DA20
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<TITLE></TITLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1170" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left>-----Original Message----- From: Ted Sent: Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 3:16 PM </DIV>-------- Original Message --------
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
 <TH vAlign=baseline noWrap align=right>Subject: </TH>
 <TD>FWJudges Being Secretly Trained To Resist Constitution</TD></TR>
<TR>
 <TH vAlign=baseline noWrap align=right>Date: </TH>
 <TD>Wed, 04 Jun 2003 11:19:00 -0700</TD></TR>
<TR>
 <TH vAlign=baseline noWrap align=right>From: </TH>
 <TD>Sam Bournefree <A class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E
 href="mailto:sam_bour-@mail2world.com"><sam_bour-@mail2world.com></A></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<DIV>
<DIV> From: Larry
Russell 
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=GENERATOR>Subj:
Judges Being Secretly Trained To Resist Constitution I think that this is a subject that we should look
into as it impacts every aspect of our work. </DIV>
<DIV>
J.A.I.L. News Journal ____________________________________________________________________ Los Angeles, California 
May 11, 2003 
 Judges Being Secretly
Trained To Resist Arguments Based on
Constitution 
Fearful of growing backlash from the public against
arbitrary, prejudiced, and even malicious judgments that are protected by
judicial immunity, judges have banded together under government sponsorship to
devise means of defending themselves from aggrieved and increasingly militant
pro se litigants. 
 
<HR>

Continuing Education Credit Prejudices Judges by June Wisniewski 
The Anti-Government Movement Handbook is a training manual for judges and court staff against pro
se litigants, published in 1999 by the National Center for the State Courts
(NCSC) in Williamsburg, Virginia. This book, along with Dealing With
Common Law Courts: A Model Curriculum for Judges and Court Staff,
published in 1997 by NCSC, was developed from an Institute for Course Management
(ICM) course on dealing with common law courts, held in Scottsdale, Arizona,
February 5-7, 1997. The curriculum and manuals for this course were
prepared with a grant from the State Justice Institute: Award No.
SJI-96-02B-B-159, The Rise of Common Law Courts in the United States: An
Examination of the Movement, the Potential Impact on the Judiciary, and How the
States Could Respond. The State Justice Institute (SJI) is a non-profit, 501C(3)
corporation that was started in 1986 and funded by Congress to develop courses
and training manuals for state courts and judicial training
organizations. This course and training manuals were developed by a group
of 27 judges, court clerks, court administrators, and prosecutors in Arizona who
examined the history and procedures of the Common Law Court Movement (CLC) and
created the training curriculum and responses that courts, judges, and court
administrators can use when dealing with common law courts in their own
jurisdictions. My contact at the conference said that one of its goals was to
identify ways the courts can make preemptive strikes against the CLC
movement. Some of the keynote speakers who helped produce the CLC course
in Arizona were Chief Justice Thomas Moyer of Columbus, Ohio, T.C. Brown of
Columbus, Ohio (a reporter for the Cleveland Plain Dealer), and Jonathan
Mozzochi, Executive Director of the Coalition for Human Dignity in Seattle,
Washington. Mozzochi, who distributed Guns and Gavels, a
publication of the Coalition, was listed as "nationally recognized expert on militias
and hate group activity." The Coalition is like a
west coast version of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). I
originally found out about this course by watching a videotaped session of the
1996 combined conference of the Conference of Chief Justices (CCJ) and the
Conference of State Court Administrators (COSCA), held in Nashville, Tennessee
in the summer of 1996 and called Impact of the Common Law Court Movement on the
Courts. More than 50 state Supreme Court justices and state court administrators
attended the Tennessee conference. The CLC session was taped with a grant from
SJI. Keynote speakers were Michael Reynolds, senior intelligence analyst for the
SPLC, and James Reynolds, chief of the Terrorism and Violent Crime Section, U.S.
Department of Justice. The panel discussion included Susan Hansen, senior
reporter with American Lawyer, Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice
Thomas Moyer (past president of CCJ), Utah Supreme Court Justice Michael
Zimmerman, and Judges Jeffrey Langton and Gregory Mohr from Montana. The taped
session was more than three hours long. At the end of the session, one of the
speakers mentioned that there was funding for additional CLC conferences. I
immediately called ICM, located at NCSC in Virginia, and asked about the
additional CLC conferences. My contact told me that a Scottsdale conference was
going to take place in about three days. Since those two conferences, there have
been additional conferences sponsored by SJI with other
organizations. SJI sponsored a conference with the American Judicature
Society in Scottsdale, Arizona in November, 1999 that was closed to the public
and the press. There will also be an ICM course in Orlando, Florida on February
5-7, 2001 called Increasing Access to Justice for Pro Se Litigants, with that
organization's perception of what access means. Constitutionalists in
Court was held in the St. Paul-Minneapolis, Minnesota area in the summer of
2000 by the National Judicial College (NJC) of Reno, Nevada, and the same course
was held again November 13-14, 2000, also at NJC in Reno. This course discusses
the history of protest movements affecting the judiciary, identifies typical
challenges and ways to handle them, anticipates courtroom security needs, and
plans solutions and strategies. NJC, together with the University of
Nevada, Reno (UNR), conducted a survey, developed material for their courses
from SJI materials and grants, and published a brief report called Right-Wing
Extremist Challenges to the Authority and Jurisdiction of the Court in 1998.
This course and report contains a preemptive plan against pro se litigants and
others who may disagree with the court, including the American Civil Liberties
Union (ACLU), Native American protest groups, religious organizations, and
anyone else who may take issue with a court decision. The information from NJC
is so controversial that NJC has banned its course and conference materials from
the public, but their library and the SJI repository is open to the
public. I originally started researching judicial training organizations
in 1996 after I was denied an inheritance by the New Jersey court system when my
parents died and was also denied entrance to a conference and course materials
at NJC in May, 1996, called The National Conference on the Media and the
Courts: Working Together to Serve the American People. The media conference
was closed to the public. Only one New Jersey judge, Martin Kravarick, attended
that conference. Judge Kravarick was elected president of the American Judges
Association (AJA), a judge's organization under NCSC. AJA publishes a quarterly
journal called Court Review, available in your local law library, by
subscription, or through interlibrary loan. I first found out about the
judicial movement against pro se litigants and the CLC movement by reading
Kravarick's President's Message in the Fall, 1996 issue of Court Review. I
called Judge Kravarick for more information on what the CLC movement was all
about, and he gave me some additional contact information. I called Mike
Reynolds of SPLC, and he told me there were four conference proceedings and that
the conference was taped. I waited over three months to get a copy of the tape,
Impact of the Common Law Movement on the Courts. That tape is available
through interlibrary loan from NCSC along with the training manuals mentioned
above. Each state has an SJI repository for all publications put out by
the organizations they have funded. For example, the repository in Nevada is at
NJC in Reno. In New Jersey, the SJI repository is at the New Jersey State
Library in Trenton. You can check out these training manuals with a New Jersey
library card. You can also find out where your SJI repository is by looking it
up on the Internet at <A class=moz-txt-link-freetext
href="http://www.statejustice.org">http://www.statejustice.org</A>, by calling
SJI at 703-684-6100, or by writing to the State Justice Institute, 1650 King
street, Alexandria, VA� 22314. SJI is funded by Congress with your
tax dollars. If you don't like the courses and materials they are funding, you
can write to your senator or congressman, or directly to SJI and ask them to
stop funding these materials. SJI gets very few letters from the public, and I'm
sure they would love to hear from you. When you get to their Web site, read and
download the newsletters. Most of their new grants are in their
newsletters. The National Center for State Courts is an umbrella
organization for several judges' organizations such as the National College of
Probate judges (NCPJ), AJA, CCJ, COSCA, ICM and others. I have been a member of
NCPJ since 1996 and have attended four judges' conferences. The most
controversial and harmful material against the public is coming from NJC and
NCSC materials, two agencies that compete with each other for SJI and federal
government funding. In the training manuals mentioned above, there are
two sections in each book where the writers advise judges and court personnel
such as court clerks and guards on how to handle pro se litigants using a
step-by-step process. The writers of these manuals reveal a court that is biased
and has a dangerous point of view about justice and equal access in the court
system. 
Copyright © 2001 June
Wisniewski -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
The Author:� June Wisniewski is a legal researcher
and journalist in Reno, Nevada, who can be reached at <A
class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated
href="mailto:reno-@judicialterrorism.com.� ">reno-@judicialterrorism.com.� </A>
She has written a number of articles on judicial subjects and is author of the
book, The Coffin Chasers: An Aggrieved Litigant's Journey Through the
Corrupt World of Probate.� This article appeared in the January 5,
2001 issue of the Idaho Observer and is reprinted here with
knowledge of the author.� Its subject matter is the basis of another book,
Unequal Justice: The Inside Story of the National Judicial
College. 
<HR>
 The judicial system
is fighting every Constitutional argument imaginable that they
see� threatening� their� tyrannical empire. However, they just
have not� figured out how to resist the rising national movement of
JAIL4Judges. This became apparent when a California judge took� special
note on the record� of this organization, stating that this
organization� sends out thousands� of email messages against the
judiciary all over the country, and that he too receives them, but does not read
them. The power of J.A.I.L. lies in the fact that it is not
based upon a legal argument made before a judge in a courtroom, to which the
judges could be trained to resist, but rather in passing a constitutional
amendment outside the court's power by a vote of the people. J.A.I.L. is an acronym for Judicial Accountability
Initiative Law JAIL's very informative website is found at <A
href="http://www.jail4judges.org/">www.jail4judges.org</A> JAIL proposes a unique new addition to our form of
government. JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY
hope! JAIL is spreading across America like a fast moving wildfire! JAIL
is making inroads into Congress for federal accountability! JAIL may be
supported at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603 To subscribe or be
removed:� <A
href="mailto:AddRe-@jail4judges.org">AddRe-@jail4judges.org</A> E-Groups, sign on at <A
href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join</A> Forum to make your voice heard <A
href="mailto:JAIL-So-@yahoogroups.com">JAIL-So-@yahoogroups.com</A> Ask not what J.A.I.L. can do for me, but ask what I can do
for J.A.I.L. "..it does not require a majority to prevail, but
rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
- Samuel Adams "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of
evil to one who is striking at the root." -- Henry David
Thoreau </DIV></DIV> </BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C32ABE.9DD2DA20--


	Previous Message	All Messages	Next Message

Concerned about privacy? Topica is TrustE certified.
See our Privacy Policy.