|
1000 Years in Hell - Critique Of Critique - 8
|
John Henry
|
Oct 08, 2004 23:13 PDT
|
HERB EVANS CRITIQUES HERETIC JOEY FAUST'S CRITIQUE
By Herb Evans
E-mail: HerbE-@juno.com
64. Herb writes: "What is received for the Faust emphasized 'BAD' things
done in the body? Wood, hay, and stubble are received and subsequently
burned up!"
That is some deal! I get to live a life of sloth and unfaithfulness, and
then the worse thing that can happen at the Judgment Seat is that my
UNFAITHFULNESS burns up?! -- Joey Faust
Sucha deal! The King of the Jews offers sucha deal. The GIFT of eternal
life is sucha deal bought and paid for buy the blood of Christ.
Unfortunately, the rewards are not procured that way. Joey has the GIFT of
God and the works of the saints mixed up. Loss of rewards is not sucha
deal. -- Herb Evans
This is TERROR? Does God burn up my bad works in such a ferocious way that
it scares me and motivates me to service? [note the circular argument,
since Joey first assumes this is the terror of the Lord at the JSOC] Can
you imagine this with an earthly judge? Can you imagine a man saying, "I am
afraid to go to court. I have heard stories that this judge grabs your
ticket and crumbles it up into a BALL and then lights it on FIRE! I just
don't think I would be able to endure such a thing!" This is ridiculous.
Paul teaches that more than this is RECEIVED at the Judgment Seat: --
Joey Faust
Well, we can now add "terror" to the Campbellite counterparts to
water--fire, burn, stripes, chastise, punish, destroy, and now terror. To
the "overcomer cult" they mean the lake of fire, hell, and being slain by
God at the JSOC, even though they are not mentioned in those places. Joey
need not argue with Herb Evans about this, for it is God that tells us that
the works are burned and not the believer. If that is ridiculous, then we
stand ridiculed in the Lord and loving it. -- Herb Evans
1 Corinthians 3:15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss:
but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire. 16 Know ye not that ye
are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? 17 If
any man defile the temple of God, HIM shall God destroy; for the temple of
God is holy, which temple ye are.
Verse 17 interprets the passage for us and shows WHAT gets destroyed by the
TERROR of the Lord. Yet, this man, after missing the Millennium, will be
restored and "saved" into eternity (v.15). --Joey Faust
Unfortunately, the temple that gets destroyed here is the old body, an
earthly body on earth. No millennium is mentioned. We are glad that Joey
mentioned this. Since Joey has committed himself to not allowing the old
body, whatever he thinks that is or is not to be "resurrected" or "raised."
He has not told us what body it is, unfortunately, that will be "raised."
Notice that the Holy Spirit is in the temple of God, the old body, in
Joey's own proof text. Now, with just a tiny bit of logical deduction, we
can determine here that it is the HOLY temple of God that is under threat
of destruction, the old body. Elementary, Watson! Perhaps, Joey will change
his mind or come up with another pat answer to plug up the hole in this
problem that he has. Nothing here about the millennium, the lake of fire,
or hell. This is all a figment of a deluded heretic, blinded by his own
vain, forced theories. -- Herb Evans
65. Herb writes: "Joey Faust is trying to make "SAVED SO AS BY FIRE" mean
'SAVED BY FIRE.'"
Herb appears to think he can understand a book by reading the quotes at the
start of the chapter. He appears to do the same with Scripture itself. I
never state that a person is "saved by fire." I show that "by" in the King
James Bible often means THROUGH or WITH:
"BY: 3. Through, or with..." (Webster's 1828). -- Joey Faust
Joey's dictionary maneuvers provides us with the interpretation, "saved
THROUGH FIRE," just as the Campbellite favorite verse of Noah being saved
"BY water" is so interpreted through water. We prefer "by water" in the
sense of via water." Neither the fire saves them nor the water. -- Herb Evans
This is seen in the following verse:
Exodus 29:18 ....it is a sweet savour, an offering made BY FIRE unto the
LORD. -- Joey Faust
No fair. Foul! It does not say "made so as by fire." But then his verse
does tend to prove my point rather than Joey's, for the offering was not
made by the fire just as the believer is not saved by the fire but "so as
by fire." -- Herb Evans
Herb also imagines that the words "so as" prove that the fire does not
REALLY exist. Webster defines the words "so as" with the following words:
-- Joy Faust
Well, Joey resorts back to misrepresentation of Herb in that Herb Evans
does believe that the fire actually exits, for how could the wood, hay, and
stubble be burned up by the fire? Cute but not very convincing. --Herb Evans
"'There is something equivalent in France and Scotland; SO AS it is hard
calumny upon our soil to affirm that so excellent a fruit will not grow
here.' But in like phrases, we now use THAT; 'So that it is a hard
calumny...'" (Web.1828).
Applying this definition to 1 Corinthians 3:15, it would mean something
similar to, "He himself shall be saved; yet so THAT IT IS by fire."
Scripture uses the words "so as" in this way: -- Joey Faust
Perhaps, Joey should go in for dictionary maneuvering rather than false
doctrine. "SO AS IT IS" is not the same as "SO AS BY." Note that Joey
leaves the "so" and steals the "it is" from Webster's quote, reverses the
words, and incorporates it into 1 Cor. 3:15. All this and all Webster was
alluding to is that "SO AS" is now replaced by "THAT." What a shyster! I
sure would not buy a used car from him. -- Herb Evans
Esther 9:27 The Jews ordained, and took upon them, and upon their seed, and
upon all such as joined themselves unto them, SO AS it should not fail,
that they would keep these two days according to their writing, and
according to their appointed time every year; -- Joey Faust
Hey, explain "SO AS" as a "THAT" here, without our objection but it still
does not make Joey's strained case in 1 Cor. 3:15. It would then say, "he
shall be saved, that by fire," which would amount to the same thing as "so
as by fire." Joey still can't get the man burned. Only the works are
burned. --Herb Evans
66. Herb writes: "Noah and his family were saved by water, right? Oh? No?
It says eight souls were saved 'BY WATER' (1 Pet. 3:20)."
Herb simply proves MY point here. Noah went THROUGH literal waters before
he was rescued out them by the Lord causing them to asswage (Gen.8:1) This
simply shows that the word "by" can mean "through" or "with" in the New
Testament. -- Joey Faust
That is the point I was trying to make to begin with, dummy. They were not
in the water, ol' boy, they were in the ark (Christ). Those in Christ will
not be in the fire as well. The water did not save them. They were saved by
or "via" water. By the same token, the believer is saved and not DESTROYED
by or via the fire that burns up the works and tries the gold. The fire
will not save the believer. Joey even tells us that the fire is supposed
to DESTROY the believer--not save him. -- Herb Evans
67. Herb writes: "NEITHER passage teaches that the fire nor the water saves
the participants. Contrarily, they teach that these participants are saved
apart from and in spite of the fire and the water."
I certainly agree that fire does not save! This is where Romanism errs. My
book shows that fire or any punishment does not save or merit eternal
salvation. The passage in 1 Corinthians states that the carnal Christian
will be RESCUED OUT OF the fire. Noah was rescued out of the water. --
Joey Faust
It says no such thing. Noah was not in the water; he was in the ark
(Christ). The believer is not in the fire either. -- Herb Evans
Since the passage in 1 Corinthians is dealing with a carnal man, and since
it is a judgment passage, we conclude that the fire does HURT the man
before he is rescued out of it. -- Joey Faust
Has Joey ever considered that we reject his conclusions?-- Herb Evans
Paul interprets his words in this manner when he concludes by saying that
the man who defiles his temple will be DESTROYED. All Herb has proven is
the very thing my book maintains; that is, that "by," the Spirit means here
"through" or "with," and that the man will be saved out of it. If the MAN
is literal, then so is the FIRE: -- Joey Faust
Then, what are Joey and I arguing about? What is he trying to say? That
the believer is destroyed so as by fire? When the man is saved so as by
fire? The man is literal. The fire is literal. But the "saved out of it" is
a fabrication of Joey Faust. It literally does not say that. That is
another forced interpolation into scripture. --Herb Evans
Revelation 2:11 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith
unto the churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second
death. -- Joey Faust
On to more Joey Faust verse flinging without exegesis. Obviously, we
believe that anyone who overcomes by the blood of the lamb will not be hurt
of the second death (lake of fire). -- Herb Evans
Hebrews 10:26 For if WE sin wilfully after that we have received the
knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, 27 But
a certain fearful looking for of judgment and FIERY indignation, which
shall devour the adversaries. 28 He that despised Moses' law died without
mercy under two or three witnesses: 29 Of how much sorer punishment,
suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son
of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was
sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of
grace? 30 For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I
will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his
people. -- Joey Faust
Joey's favorite passage is Hebrews 10, obviously, for as much as Joey comes
back to it. But it disproves what he is trying to say. Notice that physical
death under Moses is being compared. Naturally, Joey zeros in on the word
"FIERY," which we must add to our Campbellite counterpart list, for he has
never seen fire that he doesn't like. Of course it is fiery indignation not
a fiery lake, but Joey doesn't care. He just claims it as proof of his
heresy. Automatically, this is supposed to be the judgment seat of CHRIST
and lake of fire by innuendo as opposed to the judgment seat of the Father,
who was involved in the deaths under Moses. -- Herb Evans
Mark 9:38 And JOHN answered him, saying, Master, we saw one casting out
devils in thy name, and he followeth not us: and we forbad him, because he
followeth not us. 47 And if THINE eye offend thee, pluck it out: it is
better for thee to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, than having
two eyes to be cast into hell fire: --Joey Faust
Joey is getting redundant, we already have commented on this verse. Joey
would have more credibility with us if he or his followers would begin to
pluck out their eyes, so that they could go into the kingdom with ONE eye.
-- Herb Evans
68. Herb writes:"Faust has violated every rule of contextual
interpretation Regarding Revelation 2:11: 1. It does not say here that
anyone WILL be hurt of the second death; it only says that overcomers WON'T
be hurt, a promise to ALL believers like other promises in Rev. 2 & 3."
Where is this absurd rule that Herb quotes? Where is his example in the
context of the promises? Herb offers this excuse, yet he does not deal with
an entire chapter I wrote to expose it as a fable. Herb pretends that a
conditional promise (overcoming) does not imply a warning. -?Joey Faust
AN IMPLIED WARNING TO WHO is the question? And a Promise to who is the
other question? Just like Joey loves to turn God's "I will not's" into "I
will's," he also loves to change the "shall not's" into "shall's" (here)
and His "shall not's" in other places to "shall's." The only condition here
is "overcoming," something Joey has made another mess of, when he likens
this to works for continuous salvation. -- Herb Evans
Revelation 2:11 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith
unto the churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death.
Is Herb telling us that we may fail to overcome and NOT be hurt by the
second death? - Joey Faust
Herb is telling Joey that we, who have overcome by the blood of the lamb
will not be hurt by the second death or lake of fire. Herb is telling Joey
that those in the churches, who have not overcome by the blood of the lamb
are lost and will get hurt of the second death, if they do not get saved.
Joey implies that if it says churches, everyone is automatically saved in
those churches. -- Herb Evans
Notice the following Scripture:
Exodus 12:13 And the blood shall be to you for a token upon the houses
where ye are: and when I see the blood, I will pass over you, and the
plague SHALL NOT be upon you to destroy you, when I smite the land of Egypt.
Did this nice promise fail to also imply that those WITHOUT the blood on
their doors would be judged? It is absurd to think so. The "overcomer"
promises is the Book of Revelation are all conditioned upon overcoming! --
Joey Faust
There was no need of a negative implication from the positive promise, for
God had declared the negative that He would do in the previous verse (12).
We have just said that the condition in Rev. 2 was overcoming by the blood
of the Lamb, much like Joey's comparative proof text. It is the blood that
overcomes and not works. Anyone that would try to rob believers of God's
promise is an EVIL man, and I believe that Joey Faust is such an evil man
to do what he is doing. Seasoned troops can easily see through Joey, but
the novices and unlearned and unstudied Christian will become his prey. The
fox is in the chicken house, and some of the brethren are giving this
heretic a free pass. -- Herb Evans
69. Herb writes: "2. Faust's condemnation that 'overcoming' means 'not to
be carnal, unrepentant, or unconfessed,' which does not even hint at the
Bible's definition of overcoming. He just makes it up."
I maintain that "overcoming" in Revelation 2 and 3 means GETTING
EXPERIENTIAL VICTORY over the world, the flesh and the Devil in the
Christian WALK: -- Joey Faust
Did you see the bullfighter wave his cape? Joey maintains? That and a dime
won't buy a cup of coffee. Who cares what Joey maintains? Joey tells folks
that garbage but never tells them HOW MUCH will get them out of being
killed at the JSOC and being thrown into the lake of fire or how much will
get them into it. Joey Faust is a false prophet, first class. -- Herb Evans
Revelation 2:10 Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold,
the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye
shall have tribulation ten days: BE THOU FAITHFUL unto death, and I will
give thee a crown of life. 11 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the
Spirit saith unto the churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the
second death. -- Joey Faust
Did you get that, believer? Joey is suggesting that you have to die for
your faith in order to have continuous eternal life and to escape the JSOC
slaying and being thrown in the lake of fire. Rubbish! Again, Joey changes
a promise into a condition. This is a martyr's crown--not eternal life. --
Herb Evans
"Overcometh" is defined by "be thou faithful." It means to resist the Devil
and ENDURE the persecutions without DENYING Jesus. This is clear, plain,
and obvious to anyone who is not attempting with all their might to read
their own emotional prejudices received from tradition into Scripture.
--Joey Faust
Just like that, Joey grabs an instruction, forces it into a promise, and he
comes out with a definition of overcoming. How faithful does a man have to
be unto death to overcome? One hundred percent? Ninety? How much faithful
to keep one out of the lake of fire? Check out a Catholic priest for the
answer. -- Herb Evans
70. Herb writes: "3. We do not overcome by our works, we overcome the
wicked one and the world by the blood of the Lamb (1 John 1:13,14; Rev.
12:11) and by the word of our testimony and by the Holy Spirit (1 John 4:4)."
Here Herb creates a smokescreen of confused ideas in an apparent attempt to
make the reader think he has a worthy objection. --Joey Faust
Smokescreen? This is plain English. Plain Bible English. Is this another
misdirection play? --Herb Evans
The POWER we use to OVERCOME in the Christian WALK is certainly the Blood
of Jesus and His daily supply of grace. This is stated repeatedly in my
book. This is one reason the punishment is so severe. The power, blood and
grace is so precious and so available to every saint, that it merits a
severity of judgment by our Lord. If Herb is trying to say that
"overcoming" in Revelation 2 and 3 simply means GET SAVED AND BECOME A
CHRISTIAN, we would have to reply that such as idea is ludicrous. I have
shown why in my book. Herb has responded to NONE of the arguments given. I
will give a few here. First, John is writing to CHRISTIANS:
Now, here comes the weasel wording-the word "power" is not here. Joey
claims the POWER we use to overcome, but that POWER is not enough in
itself, since we must help it along by our works. This heretic really makes
me sick at my stomach. -- Herb Evans
Revelation 1:4 John to the seven CHURCHES which are in Asia: Grace be unto
you, and peace, from him which is, and which was, and which is to come; and
from the seven Spirits which are before his throne; 5 And from Jesus
Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead,
and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved US, and
washed US from our sins in his own blood, 9 I John, who ALSO AM YOUR
BROTHER, and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of
Jesus Christ, was in the isle that is called Patmos, for the word of God,
and for the testimony of Jesus Christ.
So we are to believe that the Holy Ghost is telling John's brethren, who
are bought by the Blood to GET SAVED?! Is this the context of "overcome" in
Revelation 2 and 3? Or is the context plainly Jesus and the Spirit
exhorting BELIEVERS to CONTINUE in the RACE?: -- Joey Faust
Joey imagines that they are all saved because they are in churches. No, not
to get saved, if already bought by the blood. They are being comforted in
their salvation, to know that they are not doing it all for nothing. Grace
and PEACE is the salutation that is extended to them. -- Herb Evans
Revelation 2:25 But that which ye have already hold fast till I come. 26
And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I
give power over the nations:
The above verses are clear enough. The context of these conditional
promises is Jesus exhorting the saints to HOLD FAST, GET VICTORY, and KEEP
HIS WORKS unto the end. Is this how Herb thinks a lost man gets
saved? --Joey Faust
The reward is to those, who keep Christ's works--not their own works. Who
said anything about lost men in this context of "overcomers?" Another straw
man, Joey? Why shouldn't Christians be encouraged to do such things. These
things are not contested. The motive for such things is what is being
contested. What should the instructions be to saved people. Don't hold
fast? Don't get victory? Don't keep his works? Joey thinks that only his
fellow heretics believe in doing these things. Now, I know that I have been
doing a bit better job at this than one of his loose cannon promoters, who
goes to a dating service for a sweetie, while still married. -- Herb Evans
71. Herb then reverses gears and helps me make MY argument. He lists all
the conditional overcoming promises and then asks if I also believe carnal
Christians will miss out on these blessings. I certainly do! Here is Herb's
list:
a. will not eat of the hidden manna (Rev. 2:17)
b. will not be given a white stone (2:17)
c. will not have a new name written therein (2:17)
d. will not be given power over the nations (2:26)
e. will not rule with Christ with a rod of iron (2:27)
f. will not receive the MORNING STAR (Rev 2:28)
g. will not be dressed in white raiment. (3:5)
h. WILL BE blotted out of the Book of life. (3:5)
i. will not be confessed before Christ's Father (3:5)
j. will not be confessed before the angels (Rev. 3:5)
k. will not be a pillar in God's temple (3:12)
l. will not go no more in or out (3:12)
m. will not have the name of God's city written on him (3:12)
n. will not have God's new name written on him (3:12)
o. will not sit on Jesus' throne (3:21)
All of these promises are in the CONTEXT of warnings to the CHURCHES. I
therefore apply them to Christians. -- Joey Faust
I also apply them to the saved church members along with the lost church
members. I therefore apply the distinction as lost versus saved church
members rather than carnal versus non-carnal church members. So what? --
Herb Evans
Herb also adds a verse containing three overcoming promises that are NOT in
this context:
p. will not inherit all things (Rev. 21:7)
q. will not have the Lord to be his God (21:7)
r. will not be God's son (21:7)
These last three promises are in the context of ETERNITY (after the
Millennium) in Revelation 21. It would seem reasonable that the Spirit
would now deal with positional salvation and overcoming the penalty of
eternal sin by faith alone. If the promise in Revelation 21 is still to be
applied to the people the Book is mainly addressed to (the churches), then
I would certainly say that a carnal believer will not experience the above
blessings during the MILLENNIUM:
1. Paul states plainly that carnal believers will not inherit the Kingdom
(Galatians 5, Ephesians 5, 1 Corinthians 6). [dealt with PREVIOUSLY]
--Joey Faust
Where is that term used, i.e. "carnal believers?" Where does it even say
"believers" there? Another interpolation? We have positional eternal life
and salvation NOW! NOW we are the sons of God. -- Herb Evans
2. The promise of God being the believer's God and Father in Revelation 21
is interpreted (in regard to Christians) in other places of the New
Testament. [??? - Herb Evans]
We are in the realm of practical truth concerning a Christian's daily WALK.
Every believer is already a "son of God" positionally. But every believer
is not WALKING with God and FULLY ENJOYING the practical blessings of this
relationship. Or, another way of looking at it this distinction is to
divide between TWO types of sonship. There is an eternal relationship by
faith alone; and then there is a Millennial relationship through faith and
works. It is clear that the promise in 2 Corinthians 6 is conditioned upon
a walk of SEPARATION. All Christians (especially in this day and age) are
not separated. There are other similar promises to believers:
The Christians that inherit the Millennium are in a special sense "children
of God" and "children of the resurrection." They are FIRSTBORN and receive
a DOUBLE portion (both the Millennium and eternity):
In conclusion, Herb's use of Revelation 21 is somewhat out of context. My
book deals with Revelation 2 and 3 where the persons addressed are plainly
the people in the Seven CHURCHES, who are already John's BRETHREN [doesn't
say that ? Herb Evans]. -- Joey Faust
There you have it in Joey's own words. No further comment needed. Joey's
convoluted scheme has two different kinds of children of God, two different
kinds of sons of God, and two different kinds of new birth. Do you buy it?
We certainly do not. You must overcome by works; the blood of the lamb is
not enough. All believer saints have the incorruptible inheritance and also
the earnest of that inheritance (Holy Spirit), who have been made meet for
that inheritance by the death and resurrection of our Saviour (Eph.
1:11,14,18; Col. 1:12, 13; 1 Pet. 1:3, 4. The Saints inherit all things,
and Joey Faust is a heretic. -- Herb Evans
The CARNAL, the NON CARNAL, the LOST, and the KINGDOM of HEAVEN
Whosoever therefore shall BREAK one of these LEAST COMMANDMENTS, and shall
teach men so, he shall be called LEAST IN THE KINGDOM FOF HEAVEN: but
whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called GREAT IN THE
KINGDOM OF HEAVEN. For I say unto you, That except your RIGHTEOUSNESS SHALL
EXCEED the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall IN NO CASE
ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN. --Matthew 5:19, 20
Joey Faust attempts through the power of suggestion, misplaced proof texts,
misinterpreted proof texts, innuendo, erroneously linked proof texts,
inference, pontification, and pat answers to advance his cause of making a
distinction between the carnal and the non carnal and is still unable to do
it. Here is a passage that makes a distinction between two groups of
believers and the lost. Both groups of Christians end up in the kingdom of
heaven, the one in the position of greatness and the other in the position
of least. The lost are denied entrance into the kingdom of heaven, because
they only have their own righteousness, which is not sufficient
righteousness, even that righteousness of the Lord Jesus Christ, which is
obtained by believing. By teaching the heresy that he does, Joey Faust, if
he makes it to the kingdom, will doubt end up as the least in that kingdom.
So, it can be seen here that the differentiation amongst Christians is
position rather than entrance versus exclusion. ? Herb Evans
Rewardable Trial by FIRE and the Apostle of Uncertainty
That the TRIAL of your faith IS PRECIOUS, being much more precious than
GOLD that persisheth, though it BE TRIED WITH FIRE, might be found UNTO
PRAISE and honor and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ. --1 Peter 1:7
Yet if a man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him
glorify God on this behalf. For the time is come that JUDGMENT must begin
at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of
them that obey not the gospel of God. And if the righteous scarcely be
saved, where shall the ungodly and sinner appear? -- 1 Peter 4:16-18
Joey Faust, spiritual arsonist, apostle of uncertainty, sees a fire in
everything; he has never met a fire that he does not like. It is time for
Joey to learn something about Fiery Fires and Fiery Judgment that do not
involve carnality or sin or punishment.
What we have here is FIERY JUDGMENT that has nothing to do with carnality
or sin or punishment of the believer. Only two camps here--the lost and the
righteous. No distinctions are made between the carnal and the non
carnal. These are righteous folks going through a FIERY TRIAL. The
comparison is to earthly GOLD that is TRIED by FIRE. No burned up Christian
here, only Christians going through a Fire. This trial is much more
PRECIOUS than earthly gold and will be rewarded at the appearing of the
Lord at the JSOC. Praise and honor and glory, heavenly GOLD. This FIERY
trial is called a judgment of the righteous, which begins with them--not
the carnal, and is rewarded accordingly. Even the righteous are said to be
scarcely saved. It is too bad that Joey Faust cannot use these fiery,
judgment passages to get you into the lake of fire and hell, dear reader.
Now, Joey Faust's RULE is that if it can happen on earth, it can happen at
the JSOC. 'Nuff said! Thank you Jesus! -- Herb Evans
CONCLUSION
And EVERYONE that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father,
or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall
receive an hundred fold, and SHALL INHERIT ETERNAL LIFE. -- Matthew 19:29
Since Joey Faust loves to adapt certain instructions and promises in the
word of God to conditions for continuous eternal life, we thought it
appropriate for Joey to adapt just one more conditional passage (above) to
his scheme, which surely will insure his getting killed at the JSOC and his
trip to the lake of fire and hell.
|
|
 |
|
