Has anyone taken the time to look at Tim Bray's alternate RDF
syntax[1]? I had a go at trying to convert my RSS 1.0 feed to use the
new syntax without much success[2].
I'm pretty comfortable these days with the style of RDF used in RSS
and other 'modern' RDF applications so I have less of a problem with
the syntax than I used to. Is the current syntax really limiting RDF
development?
Ian Davis
