|
Re: RDF Syntax Retrospective
|
Ian Davis
|
Jun 02, 2003 03:31 PDT
|
On Monday, 02 June 2003 at 06:26, jimbo-@hotmail.com wrote:
| | | | Using QNames in attribute values is evil
|
|
| | Why? XSD data types do that; why not RDF?
|
Because it requires the parser to inspect the attribute content. I
have enough problems with RDF's existing QName handling (concatenation
of ns uri + local part).
If we allowed rdf:dataType="xsd:double", what would dictate the xsd
prefix binding? Would I have to introduce the xsd namespace into my
document?
- Ian <ia-@internetalchemy.org>
"Never discourage anyone...who continually makes progress, no matter how slow."
|
|
 |
|
