Welcome Guest!
 II Errancy Annex
 Previous Message All Messages Next Message 
RE: [errancy] McDonald-Till Debate  Chip Kempston
 Aug 08, 2007 14:13 PDT 


--- elya-@prodigy.net.mx wrote:

 
Chip Kempston wrote:
 

--- elya-@prodigy.net.mx wrote:

 
Chip Kempston wrote:
 

--- elya-@prodigy.net.mx wrote:

 
Chip Kempston wrote:
 

--- Dennis Burdette
<time2-@frontiernet.net>
 
 
 wrote:

>Quoting elya-@prodigy.net.mx:

>
> time2-@frontiernet.net wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> CHIP:
>> >>
>> >> I can blame them. Muslims brought
the
 
 
 
 
 >crusades on
>> >> themselves by attempted to
overthrow
 
 every
 
 
 >country
>> >> between Asia Minor and Spain.
They
 
 
 
 started
 >it.
>> >>
>> > IAN
>> > Then you shoild not blame the Arabs
(Canaanites), now Palestinians for
>> > wanting to kill off the Jews who
(according
 
 to
 >the Old Testament) went
>> > in and killed off the Arabs. They
started
 
 it!
 >>> > Ian Dorion
>>
>> DB
>> I was curious where it was stated
that
 
 
 
 theJews
 >"killed off the Arabs"
>> in the OT.
>>
>> Thanks,
>
> IAN
> You're joking or you're trying to
waste my
 
 
 
 time.
 >I can't believe you
> are that stupid.
> Ian Dorion

DB
Interesting bedside matter. I think
that
 
 you
 
 should
 >be careful with
your derogatory comments when what you
write
 
 is
 
 
 >clearly wrong. First,
although you can find support for your
claim, it
 
 is
 >argumentative that
the Arabs of today are the Canaanites of
old
 
 
 
 
 >(assuming that this is
what you claim); I suspect that many of
your
 
 
 
 sources
 >would also argue
that Israelites are of Canaanite descent
too.
 
 
 >Second, however, you
used the OT as reference which clearly
demarcates
 >Arabs and Canaates;
therefore, per your reference your
comments
 
 are
 
 
 >simply wrong. You
would have a better argument, although
still
 
 
 
 
 >argumentative, if you
claimed that some Lebanese are of
Canaanite
 
 
 
 descend.
 >In either case,
you would have a hard time defending
your
 
 
 
 arguments.
 >
I suspect that you are attempting to
twist
 
 the
 
 data
 >so that your pet
theories can be justified.

There is certainly tension reflecting in
you
 
 
 
 
 >referenced, the OT,
between Israelites and what it calls
Arabs.
 
 
 
 History
 >might even argue
that Arabs were the initial aggressor
into
 
 what
 
 was
 >historically
Jewish land.

Tensions in the Middle East are
undoubtedly
 
 more
 
 
 >related to Arab
Palestinian aggression than Israel's.
Clearly,
 
 
 >Israel is only trying
to survive amidst a majority that wishes
to
 
 
 
 destroy
 >it. If the
majority of Palestinians could have
their
 
 way
 
 and
 >could murder every
Jew in the Middle East, there would
still be
 
 
 
 
 >problems in what would
then called Palestine. The Palestinians
would
 
 start
 >to fight among
themselves (as we have recently seen).
Incursions
 >from Syria or other
Arab countries would make the situation
worse.
 
 
 >
The Arab world has plenty of land to
resettle
 
 the
 >Palestinians. The
problem is that they do not want to
resettle
 
 
 
 them.
 >The kings of Jordan
was presented with great problems when
they
 
 
 
 tried to
 >help the
Palestinians following the formation of
Israel.
 
 As
 >such, the other
Arab countries do not really wish to
help
 
 the
 
 
 >Palestinians (for fear
of them), although they are happy to use
them to
 
 get
 >at Israel.

I am not a Jew but would agree with
Golda
 
 Meir's
 
 
 >statement: "Peace
will come when the Arabs will love their
children
 >more than they hate
us." The problem in the Middle East is
Arab
 
 
 
 hate.
 >
Thanks,



CHIP:

I put it like this one time: if the Jews
laid
 
 down
 
 
 their arms today, the Arabs around them
would
 
 
 
 destroy
 them. If the Arabs laid down their arms
today,
 
 there
 would be peace. That tells you a lot
about
 
 the
 
 
 situation. Evidence of this fact is that
every
 
 time
 Israel makes a peaceful overture, they get
bombed
 
 some more.
 
IAN
Let's see if I understand what you are
saying.
 
 If a
 
 gang of cut throats
from Europe come over and kick you and all
your
 
 
 
 neighbors out of your
homes and busnesses you should do nothing
about
 
 it.
 
 As long as the cut
throats do not go after you, you should
leave
 
 them
 
 alone. Is this what
you are telling me?

Also, you still have not shown me where the
Arabs/Muslims have attacked
Americans or US interests prior to the
partition
 
 of
 
 Israel.
Ian Dorion

CHIP:

Well, that's not what happened, for one. The
Jews
 
 
 bought the land the lived on when they came to
"Palestine." The Muslims didn't seem to care
until
 the numbers grew, and then the tensions grew.

 
 
 
I already responded to your last request.
Muslims
 
 
 weren't organized enough, nor did they have
the
 
 means
 prior to the last century, to attack the U.S.
or
 
 its
 interests. The only other comment I made on
this
 
 was
 that you should avoid an oversimplified post
hoc
 
 argument.
 
IAN
The Jews did buy some land and that is all well
and
 
 good. Then the UN
partitioned Israel against the will of the
Palestinians. The
Palestinian leaders told their people the Jews
were
 
 going to slaughter
them in the hopes of raising an army or
rebellion
 
 and the Palestinians
were stupid enough to believe them and fled.
Then
 
 the Israeli's would
not let them return and passed laws making these
properties Israeli
lands.

Why are you supporting America's wars for
Israel?
 
 Ian Dorion

CHIP:

Let's stay on topic, Ian. This is about the
motive
 for Muslim aggression toward everyone on the
planet,
 except for other Muslims, often only of the same
sect.
 Other countries have problems with Muslim
extremists
 that had nothing to do with supporting Israel.
Not to
 mention that many Muslim countries couldn't really
care less about Palestinians. At least you admit
that
 the Palestinian leaders attempted to instigate
fighting.

As to your last comment, I don't support America's
wars for Israel. I don't support a lot of things
that
 America does in the world. The only thing I've
said
 is that Israel is not the reason for Muslim
aggression. Muslims are commanded in their holy
book
 to take over the world and make everyone submit to
Islamic rule. It's certainly not all because of
Israel's existence. As I have pointed out, Muslim
aggression against everyone else in the world
started
 with Muhammad.
IAN
Well let's stay on topic Chip! I started this
thread and it started as
the modern history of Zionism. I got as far as 1885
to perhaps 1900 and
why Jews were discriminated against. If you and
others don't agree that
the Jews were discriminated against because they
were money lenders and
merchants and because they dressed funny and hung
together, I have no
problem with that. I looked into this after a
friend asked me 'Where is
Palestine'.
I'll be away for a few days so I'll continue when I
return next week.
Ian Dorion

CHIP:

Uh, correct me if I'm wrong, but the topic is
basically, why are Muslims attacking the U.S. and
Israel? My contention is that it's because they are a
bunch of wackos and would be doing so whether Israel
was in Palestine or not.

If you want to tell me why Jews were persecuted in
Europe, go ahead. It's not going to help your argument.


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
	
 Previous Message All Messages Next Message 
  Check It Out!

  Topica Channels
 Best of Topica
 Art & Design
 Books, Movies & TV
 Developers
 Food & Drink
 Health & Fitness
 Internet
 Music
 News & Information
 Personal Finance
 Personal Technology
 Small Business
 Software
 Sports
 Travel & Leisure
 Women & Family

  Start Your Own List!
Email lists are great for debating issues or publishing your views.
Start a List Today!

© 2001 Topica Inc. TFMB
Concerned about privacy? Topica is TrustE certified.
See our Privacy Policy.