Re: FW: sound standards for wind turbines
Feb 10, 2005 08:51 PST
You may want to investigat this a little more. This looks like an
industrial noise standard that applies to industrial and commercial sites.
Wind turbines are generally in agricultural sites and this may not be
applicable. Maybe by finding the base document and reviewing it, you could
see if it applies.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Alberts" <email@example.com>
To: "Michigan Wind Working Group" <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 10:45 AM
Subject: [Delphi] FW: sound standards for wind turbines
As some of you know, I also belong to a discussion group for Environmental
Safety and Health Communication. I asked them to help me better explain
| ||sound weighting scales. As it turns out, another member of that list is a|
former Vestas employee who still has some connections in this industry.
Below is their response. They also recommend the Oregon noise regulations
This file looks like an excerpt from a longer document (it refers to
| ||that are missing) but it gives examples of noise regulation for wind|
turbines based on L10, L50. This regulation also includes separate
requirements for low frequency noise and impulse noise.
I think it is worth reading and discussing.
Lawrence Tech's Wind Delphi Project
| ||-----Original Message-----|
From: Mark.Ba-@CH2M.com [mailto:Mark.Ba-@CH2M.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 7:21 PM
To: Phil Stiles
Subject: RE: Inquiry from Michigan
I think the answer from many technical experts would be overwhelmingly
in favor of a dBA based standard. That would be consistent with the
guidelines in the UK, Australia and Oregon's recently revised standards.
If they want to limit low frequency noise, which the dBC and dBG metrics
take into account to a greater extent than the dBA scale, it would be
best to do so directly by specifying octave or 1/3 octave band limits.
Again, the Oregon regulations would be an example of octave and 1/3
octave limits. Another option would be to limit both dBA and dBC, but
the dBC limit should be considerably higher (15 dB or so) than the dBA
From: Phil Stiles [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Wed 2/9/2005 4:40 PM
To: Bastasch, Mark/PDX
Subject: FW: Inquiry from Michigan