Welcome Guest!
 Previous Message All Messages Next Message 
Re: FW: sound standards for wind turbines  kurtguter
 Feb 10, 2005 08:51 PST 

Hi Dan,
You may want to investigat this a little more. This looks like an
industrial noise standard that applies to industrial and commercial sites.
Wind turbines are generally in agricultural sites and this may not be
applicable. Maybe by finding the base document and reviewing it, you could
see if it applies.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Alberts" <galactic-@nethere.com>
To: "Michigan Wind Working Group" <mw-@topica.com>; <hsgo-@mtu.edu>
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 10:45 AM
Subject: [Delphi] FW: sound standards for wind turbines


As some of you know, I also belong to a discussion group for Environmental
Safety and Health Communication. I asked them to help me better explain
 sound weighting scales. As it turns out, another member of that list is a
former Vestas employee who still has some connections in this industry.

Below is their response. They also recommend the Oregon noise regulations


This file looks like an excerpt from a longer document (it refers to
 that are missing) but it gives examples of noise regulation for wind
turbines based on L10, L50. This regulation also includes separate
requirements for low frequency noise and impulse noise.

I think it is worth reading and discussing.


Daniel Alberts
Project Leader
Lawrence Tech's Wind Delphi Project

 -----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Ba-@CH2M.com [mailto:Mark.Ba-@CH2M.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 7:21 PM
To: Phil Stiles
Subject: RE: Inquiry from Michigan

Hi Phil-

I think the answer from many technical experts would be overwhelmingly
in favor of a dBA based standard. That would be consistent with the
guidelines in the UK, Australia and Oregon's recently revised standards.
If they want to limit low frequency noise, which the dBC and dBG metrics
take into account to a greater extent than the dBA scale, it would be
best to do so directly by specifying octave or 1/3 octave band limits.
Again, the Oregon regulations would be an example of octave and 1/3
octave limits. Another option would be to limit both dBA and dBC, but
the dBC limit should be considerably higher (15 dB or so) than the dBA


-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Stiles [mailto:psti-@vestas-awt.com]
Sent: Wed 2/9/2005 4:40 PM
To: Bastasch, Mark/PDX
Subject: FW: Inquiry from Michigan
 Previous Message All Messages Next Message 
  Check It Out!

  Topica Channels
 Best of Topica
 Art & Design
 Books, Movies & TV
 Food & Drink
 Health & Fitness
 News & Information
 Personal Finance
 Personal Technology
 Small Business
 Travel & Leisure
 Women & Family

  Start Your Own List!
Email lists are great for debating issues or publishing your views.
Start a List Today!

© 2001 Topica Inc. TFMB
Concerned about privacy? Topica is TrustE certified.
See our Privacy Policy.