Welcome Guest!
 Network America
 Previous Message All Messages Next Message 
FBI Director: We Have No Evidence Against 9-11 “Hijackers”  Jim Condit Jr.
 May 18, 2002 03:51 PDT 
May 17, 2002 NA (Network America) e-wire

FBI Director: We Have No Evidence Against 9-11 “Hijackers”

Wwwweeeeeeelllllllll . . . in the last two days the controlled 5 Big TV
Networks and the controlled several Big Radio Networks and the
controlled Big City Daily Papers -- have had to make a BIG CONCESSION to
the independent press (that’s all of us).

The official cover story for 9-11 is perceived by the Ruling Elite as in
danger of falling apart. Carol Valentine, Michael Hoffman, Christopher
Bollyn, L.T. Patterson – and a host of others – as well as all of you
who spread such independent, investigative information around the
internet and the country – can take a bow. Now let’s turn the heat up.
Everyone into the battle!

Suddenly -- ALL the Big Media outlets are obsessing on vague
intra-governmental or intelligence agency memos which, we are told, were
given to the Bush administration before, and leading up to, – the 9-11
terror attacks.

(Bear with this background – and we will crescendo with the April 19,
2002 speech of the FBI Director given in San Francisco and reported the
next day in the Los Angeles Times.)

What has caused the sudden, coordinated, well-orchestrated, unanimous
Big Media concern over these inconsequential clues? These
inconsequential clues amount to: there may be a hi-jacking by terrorists
at some time in the future, somewhere in the world. . . . No fair person
could feel that the vague warnings being exuded over in the Big Press
could possibly be classified as specific foreknowledge of anything.

So what is happening? Why the sudden, well orchestrated fuss?

Maybe the general buzz that there is more to 9-11 than meets the eye is
reaching critical mass. Maybe some of the evidence disproving a part of
the official cover story for 9-11 has reached a significant faction. And
maybe there is a powerful outrage making itself felt from that
significant faction – maybe from the NY Firefighters, maybe from a
patriotic faction of the military, maybe from somewhere else. In any
case, something has caused the Judeo-Masonic Big Media to try and get
control of the story again by directing public attention to these
inconsequential, vague, meandering, pre-9-11 warnings.

The Big Media-directed diversion is supposed to concede what a
significant portion of the public already suspects – that there is MORE
THAN MEETS THE EYE TO THE 9-11 STORY. And, furthermore, the Big Media
says, here it is. Here’s the rest of the story: Bush had these several
vague warnings that a terrorist strike might be imminent, and he did
nothing.

In other words, admit to a very little something, in order to try and
put the natives back to sleep – and continue the Big Cover-up.

The EFFECT of the last two days publicity about vague foreknowledge by
W. Bush and his administration – is to redirect the public back to the
“it’s simple -- those darn Muslims did it” cover story – and away from
the BIG HOLES in that Cover Story – such as the preponderance of the
evidence which points to the Judeo-Masonic Ruling Elite in New York,
Washington D.C., and Tel Aviv – who had both the MEANS and the
tremendous MOTIVE to coordinate the 9-11 terror attacks – in order to
launch America into the middle east for a war against Israeli’s enemies,
the Muslims and Arabs, and to begin in earnest to dismantle the
Constitution. (Clincher: Only the Judeo-Masonic Ruling Elite could
cause America’s pervasive air defenses to stand down until the 9-11
Pageant was over – the Muslims couldn’t do that. And only their Big TV
Networks could so restrict coverage of all the facts as has been done –
the Muslims couldn’t do that.)

THERE IS ANOTHER aspect to this sudden “revelation of the method” by the
Big News Media. For that you have to read the whole thing in context by
the incomparable “twilight language” analyst Michael A. Hoffman at:

http://www.hoffman-info.com/inferno.html

Now -- to further set the context for the significance of the current
FBI Director’s April 19 admission that the FBI has found NO EVIDENCE –
no paper trail -- to tie the 19 FBI-accused Hijackers with the 9-11
event – let’s look at examples of the startling shift of emphasis about
9-11 which we’ve seen in the Big Media these last two days.

Item: On WLW radio (700 AM) today at about 1:30 PM, talk show host Bill
Cunningham (winner of the Marconi award for large market radio
personality for 2001) stated he had 7 different governmental documents
before him dated between 1992 and 1999 warning that there might be a
hijacking during which planes would be run into key buildings in the US.
Cunningham cited Drudge, Newsmax, and World Net Daily as providing these
documents.

Item: Shortly before this, Cunningham – shaken by the numerous, if
vague, warnings that went unheeded -- played news reports from the day
of 9-11 shortly before and after the Twin Towers collapsed. These TV
spots featured interviews with firefighters talking about the explosions
up and down the Twin Tower buildings which preceded the collapse. Some
of these interviews are INTERRUPTED by the explosions, as attested to by
the person being interviewed.

Cunningham also had on Bill Boshears (WLW’s weekend night guy who does a
show called ‘Scizone’) to comment on these newsclips – which Boshears
had brought to his audience during interviews he has done on the last
few weekends with a David Wegener, the head of Hope For America
Ministries.

David Wegener has done a yeoman’s job in pulling together numerous news
clips from the day of 9-11 – and other key events – before the official
spin could be “fixed” in the public mind.

You can get his simple mailing about what videos he has available by
calling 1-800-959-1991 – and after listening to a message, leave your
mailing information.

In case you don’t want to wait -- the tapes that look like a “must” from
the Wegener collection --- because of the real time video news clips
included from the first moments of key events are:

· A Great Deception – (3 ½ hours) which includes 1 hour of video clips
- $18;
· Amazing Clips Sampler (15 min), meant for introducing people to news
control and censorship, ten shocking video clips -- $5;
· Amazing Clips, Parts 1, 2, 3 – 3 tape set, 55 video clips, -- $20;

If you want to act now, send the cost of the videos you want from the
above, plus $6 for shipping and handling, to: Hope for America
Ministries, PO Box 11960 Costa Mesa, California 92627.

Even the audio portion alone -- of some of the clips, as played on WLW
radio on the Bill Boshears show, -- proved beyond doubt that people on
the scene AND newscasters covering the events witnessed clear explosions
at many different floor levels in the World Trade Tower buildings
shortly before the collapse – and long after the planes had hit. This
would indicate that the Twin Towers collapse was NOT the result of the
plane hits alone. (There was a third building which collapsed in the
Manhattan world trade center complex, which was not hit by a plane – but
this will be covered in a soon-to-be e-wire; it has been dropped from
the official 9-11 story, as has been the attack on the White House
Annex, the Old Executive Building, shown in flames on the morning of
9-11 in a live report on ABC, according to French author Thierry
Meyssan.)

Item: This concession by the Big Media, is unleashing all kinds of
information as various factions not clued in to the 9-11 treachery –
angle for political position and advantage. Rep. Charles Rangel (Dem –
NY), on Hannity & Colmes tonight – asks how W. Bush so immediately
blamed Osama Bin Laden after the 9-11 plane attacks – if the attacks
were a total surprise. (This is a good question, but not in the way
Rangel thinks. He was thinking it proved Bush had a lot of warning that
Bin Laden was “on the move”, but kept it to himself. The real import of
the question involves the indication that a “Lee Harvey Oswald” type
cover story had been cooked up for CIA-acquantance and designated fall
guy Bin Laden -- in advance of the remote control plane attacks on the
World Trade Towers.

Remote control plane attacks? Well, veteran readers know that we at
Network America insist that the overwhelming preponderance of the
evidence points to remote control plane attacks against the World Trade
Towers. (Doubters see public-action.com, “9-11 No Suicide Pilots”,
“NORAD Part 1: Inside Job”, “NORAD Part 2: Dumb Blondes”; “Flight of the
Bumble Planes”)

And now comes a book in France that has sold over 100,000 copies. From
Criminal Politics, back page, April 2002 issue:

“And then there is the new book, published in France, that has created a
firestorm over charges that the events of 9-11 were well known to the
U.S. authorities, and they assisted in setting it up and created
conditions to allow it to happen and actually guided the planes into the
World Trade Center with electronic devices . . . The book was reviewed
by the Washington Post and on the CNN morning show with Paul Zahn. The
title of the book is “The Dreadful Imposture” by a well known left wing
author and activist, Thierry Meyssan.

“This book has sold over 100,000 copies – and became, in recent weeks,
the country’s number one non-fiction best seller. Thierry claims that
9-11 was a state-sponsored action against the American people by its own
gov’t. The Pentagon, he says, was not struck by a plane but by a truck
bomb planted by rogue U.S. elements. [He says] Osama Bin Laden is a CIA
stooge and suggests that 9-11 was a culmination of a long planned
military coup to justify a dramatic increase in defense spending and the
invasion of Afghanistan and other countries in the Middle East to defend
Israel . . . He claims that the U.S, planted beacons in the World Trade
Center to help the other two planes reach their target and planted
explosives at the base of the towers to ensure their collapse . . .
WOW!” (End of quote from L.T. Patterson’s Criminal Politics).

Hey! That invasion of Afghanistan was based on real solid evidence tying
the 19 accused mostly Saudi Hijackers through Al Qaeda to the 9-11
terror attacks – wasn’t it??????? . . . WASN’T IT??????? . . . Please
tell me it was . . . . ----- Well, --

The answer is “no.” Who says? Why, the current Director of the FBI,
Robert Mueller, says, that’s who.

FBI Director Robert Mueller’s whole speech in real audio can be found
at:

http://www.commonwealthclub.org/02-04mueller-audio.html

Let’s hear from Michael Collins Piper in the May 20, 2002 edition of the
American Free Press (successor to the Spotlight, closed down due to a
judge’s decision):

“In an April 19 speech delivered to the Commonwealth Club in San
Francisco, Mueller said that the purported hijackers, in his words,
‘left no paper trail.’ The FBI Director stated flatly: ‘In our
investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper – either
here in the United States or in the treasure trove of information that
has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere – that mentioned any aspect
of the September 11 plot.’

“In describing Mueller’s evidence fiasco, Los Angeles Times reporters
Erich Lichtblau and Josh Meyer, whose article was reprinted in The
Washington Post on April 30, note that: ‘Law enforcement officials say
that while they have been able to reconstruct the movements of the
hijackers before the attacks --- all legal except for a few speeding
tickets – they have found no evidence of their actual plotting.’

“The Times reporters acknowledge that Mueller’s comments ‘offer the
FBI’s most comprehensive and detailed assessment to date of its
investigation, remarkable as much for what investigators have not found
as for what they have.’

“The FBI director explained away the absence of evidence by making the
disingenuous assertion that the hijackers used ‘meticulous planning,
extraordinary secrecy and extensive knowledge of how America works” to
conceal their scheme.

“Mueller made this claim despite the fact that in the immediate wake of
the September 11 attacks, a variety of US officials and media sources
speciously announced almost instantaneously that there was firm evidence
not only that these 19 Muslim men were agents of Osama Bin Laden’s al
Qaeda network but that they were indeed the individuals who hijacked the
doomed flights of September 11.

“Mueller seems to forget that early government and media reports loudly
hyped ‘discoveries’ – letters and other documents – in the luggage and
personal belongings of the presumed hijackers which ‘proved’ that they
were on a ‘mission for Allah’, etc. etc. etc.”

End of quote from Michael Collins Piper in the American Free Press.

(And don’t forget that about two weeks after the 9-11 terror attacks --
Attorney General John Ashcroft absurdly and pompously announced that
they had found an INTACT passport of one of the Muslim hijackers 4
blocks from the collapsed Twin Towers – AND – that they had found a
letter at each of the crash sites in Pennsylvania AND in Washington
D.C., written in Arabic by one of the hijackers in each case, and tying
them all together in a conspiracy to pull off the diverse and
coordinated terror attacks. Of course, all of these things were so
absurd, your writer couldn’t believe he was hearing such claims over
national radio. HOWEVER, Ashcroft’s handlers must know that those paying
attention will see through these obvious lies. That’s irrelevant to
them. The purpose is to use their airtight control of our airwaves to
CREATE AN IMPRESSION on the general, casually observing public – that
they “have” some “proof”. . . . One internet humorist said that, since
the FBI and Ashcroft were SIMULTANEOUSLY claiming that all four
‘indestructible’ black boxes were destroyed, that the FBI should drop
everything they were doing and invest in that paper the Muslim hijackers
were using!)

So, now that the FBI Director has admitted that after 7 months of
investigation – his agency has NO EVIDENCE to tie the accused 19 Muslims
to the 9-11 terror attacks. Let’s recall some other things we don’t
know.

Let’s turn to internet analyst Sir Peter Bunnell for a summary of some
other things we DO NOT KNOW:

“Tapes: Video and Voice.

“Air Traffic Controller tapes talking to the doomed aircraft are all
missing.

“Taped conversation presented about pilot keying his mike and angry
voices of hijackers in background presented on national TV finally
admitted by FBI to be a fake.

“All Surveillance videotapes from airport ticket counters, lounge,
boarding areas etc., that the doomed airliners departed from are all
mysteriously missing. (With the exception of the one tape shown on
national TV of Atta and Aomlari at a security checkpoint in Portland
Maine)” [Editor: What date was that video taken on? No way to know, it
proves nothing about 9-11.”]

End of quote from Sir Peter Bunnell.

Remember also, that none of the alleged “cell phone” calls have ever
been heard by the public. NOTE WELL: A new article has been forwarded to
me which we will carry in full as a separate e-wire, -- about the fact
that MIT can now simulate voices and videos of people speaking words
“put in their mouths” by the editors – so as to fool audiences. I
believe the “cell phone” calls are the Achilles’ heel of the 9-11 cover
story, if anyone can get enough momentum to properly investigate them.

Remember that Ashcroft said, when it was claimed by people in the Arab
world that 5 of the accused, and supposedly dead, 9-11 hijackers were
still alive – that (paraphrasing Aschcroft) “we may never know the true
identity of the hijackers.”

Soooooooooo . . . the question of the day is NOT “what did Bush know and
when did he know it?” Rather, . . .

The question of the day is: “What do you know, and WHEN did you first
know it???”

Answer: If you take away the pre-arranged official cover story pushed by
all five Big TV Networks, I contend that you and I know very little.

We do not know if the planes were empty or full of passengers as they
crashed into the Twin Towers in NYC, likewise we do not know if the
planes which crashed into the World Trade Towers were the ones that left
Boston and the other airport – of if they were drone planes made up to
look like the original planes.

We do not know if the planes were run into the World Trade Towers by
humans who had hijacked the plane, or by remote control technology –
although the overwhelming preponderance of the evidence points to the
remote control technology.

We do not know if there were any Muslim hijackers on board, even if
there were some passengers. We do not know if the 19 Muslim “hijackers”
were along for the remote controlled ride – of if they were ushered and
shepherded into the US by CIA/Mossad handlers – and then each killed in
some undisclosed location before the fateful planes took off on
September 11, 2001.

We do not know what was on the destroyed black boxes from any of the
planes (as one internet humorist quipped, ‘That’s why they call them
indestructible!).

We do not know what serious Congressional investigations have uncovered
– because there have been none!

What we do know ----

What we do know NOW is that on April 19, 2002, in a speech given in San
Francisco, FBI Director Robert Mueller stated that, after 7 months of
investigation, the FBI had no evidence -- and no paper trail -- tying
the accused 19 hijackers to the 9-11 terror attacks.

End of this e-wire.

Jim Condit Jr.,
Director, Network America Ewire List
Director, Citizens for a Fair Vote Count
	
 Previous Message All Messages Next Message 
  Check It Out!

  Topica Channels
 Best of Topica
 Art & Design
 Books, Movies & TV
 Developers
 Food & Drink
 Health & Fitness
 Internet
 Music
 News & Information
 Personal Finance
 Personal Technology
 Small Business
 Software
 Sports
 Travel & Leisure
 Women & Family

  Start Your Own List!
Email lists are great for debating issues or publishing your views.
Start a List Today!

© 2001 Topica Inc. TFMB
Concerned about privacy? Topica is TrustE certified.
See our Privacy Policy.