|
My Take on the Doug Hoffman Congressional Race, and A Correction
|
Jim Condit Jr.
|
Nov 03, 2009 17:51 PST
|
November 03, 2009 NA (Network America) e-wire
My Take on the Doug Hoffman Congressional Race
My “Doug Hoffman Congressional Race” Commentary is after this first
section clarifying a big oversight in my “Obama / Treaty” email I sent
out a few days ago.
* * * * *
And one more thing: Please join those who have already helped, and visit
our ChipIn at wagthedog2010.com – and help. Prioritizing the Precinct
Strategy is more important than any other effort or donation you can
make in the next six months. Thanks.
* * * * *
First: Thanks to National Precinct Activist member Terri Suggs for
pointing out to me a MAJOR OMISSION in my “Obama / Treaty” message of a
few days ago.
The article sent out was about the Bricker Amendment, which never passed
due to all out opposition by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, a covert
internationalist from the beginning, and a registered Democrat right
before he switched to Republican to run for President in 1952. (See “The
Politician” by Robert Welch, and “A Choice, Not An Echo”, by Phyllis
Schlafly.)
The paragraph left out by me, which should have appeared before the
article by Justin Raimondo, -- was about the US Supreme Court decision,
Reid vs. Covert, in 1957, which stated that no treaty could ever
supercede or nullify the Bill of Rights. Any attempt to tax Americans
from an international agency under some treaty, would violate the Bill
of Rights on several fronts, as well as be a treasonous abrogation of
American Sovereignty – something which couldn’t POSSIBLY be in the
framer’s original intent.
Of course, Obama and those behind him want a New World Government with a
new world currency, so they are trying to pretend to respect the
framer’s original intent, while working to nullify it. The battle,
clearly, is on again regarding treaties and the Constitution, which is
why I sent that ewire, and this one out.
For a better article than the one I sent out, see Dr. Edwin Vieira’s
article, “A Primer on Martial Law”, which mentions Reid v. Covert, found
here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin198.htm
And Devvy Kidd’s article, “The UN is not going to take your guns”, which
also mentions Reid v. Covert, found here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd198.htm
Thanks, Terri of Idaho, that was a MAJOR oversight and glitch on my
part, and one of the worst in the ten years of my publishing on the
internet – so I hope this helps clarify why I sent that “treaty” email
out.
* * * * * *
My Doug Hoffman Congressional Race Commentary:
As many know, Doug Hoffman is running in the 23rd Congressional
District. He didn’t win the Republican primary, which was won by
Republican New York state assemblywoman DeDe Scozzafava.
But then the Conservative Party endorsed Doug Hoffman, because
Scozzafava was such a complete left-leaning type Democrat-look-alike.
Hoffman pulled ahead of Scozzafava, who under pressure from many sides,
pulled out of the race.
Newt Gingrich endorsed Scozzafava, and Sarah Palin endorsed Hoffman.
And as of a few days ago it’s a dead heat between Hoffman and the
Democratic candidate, with RHINO Republican Scozzafava endorsing the
Democrat (!) over Hoffman as one of the latest acts in this Drama.
I believe Doug Hoffman is sincere. And I also believe the computers will
show that he won.
I’m rushing this out at about 8:30 PM on election night before the
election is decided. So if I’m wrong, I’m wrong – but here is what I
think:
As I say, I believe that Doug Hoffman is certainly sincere and as he
appears.
What caught my attention a few weeks ago was that all 5 Big TV Networks
decided to give this obscure congressional race massive and sustained
publicity.
Here’s what I think is happening, and soon I will elaborate, or admit I
was wrong, if Hoffman loses.
The Tricky but Talented Chess Players, those around the FED Banksters,
and behind all five Big TV Networks (yes, Rupert Murdock is and always
has been an insider internationalists; he hosted campaign events for
Hillary Clinton in 2008, for heaven’s sake) – know that they must
somehow try to appease, defuse, and misdirect the millions and millions
of Americans who are waking up to their puppet Obama’s agenda.
The bone they are about to throw, I think, is a Hoffman victory in the
23rd Congressional District of New York state.
Here is the message the evil Media Moguls are sending to all the newly
awakened Tea Party and 912 people, so they don’t start to listen more to
people like myself:
1) The computers are honest, you concerned constitutionalists can win if
you try. (In other words, they are telling you: “Don’t worry about those
guys that say that only subjugated countries have their votes counted in
secret, like has been happening in 99% of the counties of the USA since
1988; don’t look at the articles by Christopher Bollyn and Ronnie Dugger
– linked on the home page of votefraud.org.” That’s one deceptive
message that will be telegraphed with a Hoffman win.) –
2) You can actually make a difference by just voting, no need to go to
all the trouble of becoming a precinct executive, and then voting to
FIRE the head of your local Democratic or Republican Party. (I.e., The
Media Moguls are saying, in effect, “Don’t watch videos like the “The
Strangest Political Secret” video at wagthedog2010.com – and don’t join
together with other Americans to enter the precinct system, and don’t
make it a priority to throw out of the local county Democratic and
Republican Parties all of our local henchman and puppets currently
running those county party organizations.”)
I’ll be back with more commentary if Hoffman wins – or a retraction of
my guesstimate in this e-wire, if Hoffman loses.
Please join those who have already helped, and visit our ChipIn at
wagthedog2010.com – and help. Prioritizing the Precinct Strategy is more
important than any other effort or donation you can make in the next six
months. Thanks.
Jim Condit Jr.,
Director, Network America Ewire List
513-741-2095
Mailing Address: Network America, PO Box 11339
Cincinnati, Ohio 45211
|
|
 |
|