Welcome Guest!
 Network America
 Previous Message All Messages Next Message 
Radio Encounters of the Third Kind  Jim Condit Jr.
 Oct 10, 2003 03:03 PDT 

October 10, 2003 NA (Network America) e-wire

Editor’s short intro: Terry Hayfield called me up in year 2000, as the
Network America e-wire was first making the rounds in cyberspace. Among
the things he said to me, was the following (paraphrase): “Unlike the
other organizations pushing information about “conspiracy” or the “New
World Order” – I can prove what’s happening regarding the move to world
government from the daily news in the financial section of the

I found Mr. Hayfield’s information precise and always interesting, --
and always well documented. He came down to speak to our “Citizens for A
Fair Vote Count” convention in August 2000, and the
now-closed-by-court-order “Spotlight” carried a front page picture of
him on its cover in the first issue of September 2000 – an issue which
was devoted to our Citizens for a Fair Vote Count Convention.

This will be the first of four articles from Mr. Hayfield in the very
near future. Read each of them – and read them, maybe, twice.

NOTE WELL: For those valiant warriors all across the country fighting
the good fight for honest elections – and AGAINST the easily rigged
computerized systems that are now being installed everywhere – look at
Mr. Hayfield’s analysis and terminology carefully. He may provide the
linguistic key for HOW to talk about the unified force which operates
behind the National Democratic Party, The National Republican Party,

If you wish to contact Mr. Hayfield, do so with the email address at the
end of this article, an email address he uses because he says nobody
every passes it up without noticing it. Let the first article begin:

Radio Encounters of the Third Kind

By Terry Hayfield

There is a “Third Kind” living amongst us in this Republic. This
“Third Kind” comes in a political package disguising themselves as
Republicans (World Conservatives of the International Democrat Union)
and Democrats (World Liberals of The Third Way). The “Third Kind” wants
to establish a self-regulating classless society on planet earth. I
have had radio encounters with two Republican members of the “Third
Kind”, Anne Coulter (author of the best seller Slander) and David
Horowitz (author of Empire and Revolution and How to Beat the Democrats
and Other Subversive Ideas).

What you are about to read will readily (and always) be identified by
members of the “Third Kind” as a conspiracy theory. By calling this a
conspiracy theory the “Third Kind” wants the reader to envision this
writer sporting a Hitler style mustache, dressed in “brown-shirt”
Khakis, setting in a room with book cases filled with all kinds of
“Hate” literature and the walls decorated with Swastikas and portraits
of Der Führer. People such as Coulter and Horowitz do not want to talk
about the very real existence of the “Third Kind” nor do they want you
to know what is really taking place in this Republic and the world.

The “Third Kind” is actually the Radical Capitalist Class (RCC). The
Radical Capitalist Class is a group of people that are trying
desperately to spread a very specific American/British Capitalism based
on Fabian Socialism to encompass the globe. It is the belief of the RCC
that this Capitalism if left unopposed will naturally evolve into a
Socialism that will pave the way for Communism. The RCC uses a
continuous process known as Permanent Revolution (War, Revolution and
Terrorism) to remove all impediments (national sovereignty) for the
necessary establishment of Free Trade in order to create a global Free
Market System (Economic Democracy), catalyst for Socialism.

The ideas of this “Third Kind” are alien to the American people. Here
are a few facts to ponder:

In 1983, former Trilateral Commission (a Fabian Society Front group)
members, George Bush Sr. and Margaret Thatcher, founded an organization
called the International Democratic Union (IDU). The IDU views itself
as an organization of World Conservatives dedicated to establishing a
Free Market System and a “compassionate conservatism.” There are 70
member parties from around the world to include the Republican Party.
At the gatherings of the IDU the members set around and plot strategy
“to win the political argument” and “planning winning election
strategies” for World Conservatism. Every four years the IDU holds a
major meeting to coincide with the Republican National Convention in the
same city, at the same time and with the Republican National Committee.
Recently (June 10, 2002) George W. Bush hosted an election strategy
meeting of the IDU in the White House at which the President announced
to the world of this nation’s right to carry out pre-emptive military
strikes (translated, raw aggression) against Terrorists wherever they
may be. The IDU gave overwhelming support to this policy. All these
facts came from a 1979 Trilateral Commission membership list, the June
11, 2002 Toledo Blade, the May 8, 2002 Wall St. Journal and www.IDU.org.

Yet, when the current and leading political cheerleaders of the
Republican Party, namely Coulter and Horowitz, were confronted with the
IDU’s existence, they chanted “conspiracy theory” and pleaded ignorance,
despite saying more than they should have.

Now for the Radio Encounters of the Third Kind:

Anne Coulter, a bouncy and vivacious blonde, recently had been the
darling on the major media “talking head shows” plugging her (at that
time) recent best seller Slander in support of the Republican Party’s
election strategy. The various talk show hosts have billed her as one
of America’s most intelligent women and an expert on the politics of the
Republican Party. Coulter’s message is about how the terrible Liberal
Democrats along with the Liberal biased Media slanders conservatives,
especially conservatives of the Religious Right. Her biggest criticism
of these “Socialist radicals” is the liberal accusing the conservative
of “not being cerebral.”

Ms. Coulter was interviewed on a July 19, 2002 Omaha, Nebraska AM radio
talk show. I had the opportunity to be a “phone in” guest. I wanted to
know what kind of response Anne Coulter would give when confronted about
the Republican Party’s membership in the IDU. In the first part of the
interview Anne bemoaned the fact that the Religious Right is slandered
by the Liberal biased Media for belief in a higher being and tax cuts.
Coulter also observed when media consumers have a choice they
overwhelmingly choose “conservative” talk shows. One thing she did not
explain is why the Liberal biased Media networks had her on their
Liberal biased programs to speak kindly of conservatives. Before I got
to ask my very specific question she made the claim the Liberal biased
Media is 100% Socialist.

The question:
“I am a patriotic conservative. I am so glad you stated there is a
liberal control of the press. My research shows in some way this is a
two way street. These same liberals since 1983 have not said a word
about the Republican Party’s membership of the International Democrat
Union, that is promoting the same liberal agenda on a global basis and
then passes it off as world conservatism. Can you enlighten me on

The answer:
“No, (emitting an uneasy laugh) I think that is your field of expertise.
I don’t exactly know what you are talking about.”

The next question:
“That is exactly what I run into. The rank and file Republican does not
know the Republican Party is a member of a global Socialist
organization. You have demonstrated in the first half of your interview
that you are against this stuff and Gee, shouldn’t we know the
Republican Party is promoting international Socialism?”

The answer:
“I, I…I don’t think so…actually…um. I…mean I never understood the
idea….um…um this, this…um, secret organization theory, what are they
doing behind our backs? They take half our money. When Clinton was
president he was gunning down religious fringe groups, shipping little
boys back to Cuba and I,…umm, ummm, (now with her voice raising) They
take half our money, wetland designation tells us what we can not do
with our land, what exactly do you think they are doing secretly, (voice
really tense and still raising in tone) “Good God” Look what they are
doing right in front of us!”

Next question:
“That is the point I am driving at! You can ask any chairman of a state
Republican Party about the Republican Party membership in an
international socialist organization…”

Hurried response:
“We’re talking about something I…ummm…don’t think exists. We’ve kind of
gone off the road here…Can I have another call?”

It was more than obvious Anne Coulter did not want to discuss the IDU.
There are only two possible reasons for this. One of course is she
really did not know about the IDU. If this is the case then it is a
stretch of the imagination to consider Ms. Coulter an expert on
Republican politics. The second reason is obviously she did know about
the IDU and wasn’t about to enter into a public discussion about the
Republican Party’s membership in an international Socialist

The plot thickens!

A few weeks later David Horowitz was on the same radio station (August
6, 2002). Horowitz’s interview was prefaced by one of the hosts
describing how a previous interview was scheduled in advance but had to
be cancelled at the last minute because Mr. Horowitz had been summoned
to the George W. Bush Waco Texas ranch to talk election strategy. This
was done to demonstrate the importance of his book How to Defeat the
Democrats and Other Subversive Ideas. Would Mr. Horowitz’s response be
similar to Ms. Coulter’s?

First question:
“Hello Mr. Horowitz, how are you?


Second question:
“I was lucky enough to get an advanced uncorrected readers copy of How
to Beat the Democrats. I do believe it is a book all Republicans should
read. My question is: I understand the tactics you are trying to put
across to the Republicans but, in lieu of the recent split between Al
Gore and Joseph Lieberman, it seems there is a mad rush of Democrats
going to the center, basically through the aegis of the Democratic
Leadership Council which is also a member of an international
organization called The Third Way. Consequently, at the same time I
started reading articles a couple of months ago, one from the Wall
Street Journal for May 8, something about an organization called the
International Democrat Union made up of World Conservatives, then in the
early part of June there was an IDU meeting at the White House that
posed these World Conservatives were right of center. Does the
Republican membership of an international organization going to the
right and vacating the center open the opportunity for the likes of Joe
Lieberman and Hillary Clinton, rated by the DLC as a moderate to capture
the political center?

“Well look! You don’t want to be fooled by rhetoric or labels. How
solid is Joe Lieberman’s conservative credentials, when it took him ten
seconds to abandon all his principals to jump into the arms of Maxine
Waters when he got that nomination.”

[Author’s note: Mr. Horowitz cautions about being fooled by labels and
rhetoric, because I assume they are misleading. Notice he did not
acknowledge the existence of the IDU.]

“The Democratic Party is pulled to the left by the unions, the racist
NAACP leftists, and the teacher’s union. All these people are hard
left. It is a left wing party. It will remain left wing until it is
beaten year after year.”

[Author’s note: Horowitz then continues by painting the Democratic Party
with a list of labels using his best conservative rhetoric, as urged in
his book How to Beat the Democrats. Now pay close attention to the
following comparison. Horowitz is still using labels and conservative
rhetoric, see page 67 of How to Beat the Democrats.]

“If you look at John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan, you will not find one
scintilla of difference between them. Kennedy was a hawk on defense.
He was a militant anti-communist. He was for capital gains tax cut and
a balanced budget. And that should tell you how far to the left
American politics has slid in the last 40 years.”

[Author’s note: Yes, Horowitz is correct, don’t get fooled by labels or
rhetoric. The key phrase from the above quotation is “And that should
tell you how far to the left American politics has slid to the left.”
Consider that for a moment. Horowitz has hinted the Republican Party
has moved to the left right along with the Democrats!]

“Do you have any comments on the International Democrat Union?”

“The Democrats would say… well I…you know. I don’t know, I don’t know
what the International Democrat Union is . . . an international
organization? The “Third Way” is a deception that we used to use when
we were in the left to avoid the stigma of Communism without embracing
the American way. And that to bear, Hillary Clinton is a Socialist. I
don’t care what they say in front of the cameras. They understand where
the American people are and they are out to fool them. And Republicans
have to be vicious in their attacks on the Democrats and strike first or
be on the defensive.”

[Author’s note: Horowitz claims he doesn’t know what the IDU is or even
if it is an international organization. He then proceeds to use labels
and conservative rhetoric to lead away from talking about the IDU.
Please also note Horowitz does recognize the existence of the Third

“It seems the Republican Party, being a member of the International
Democrat Union according to their web site, they are determining
election policies in their respective member parties in their respective

[Author’s note: Pay close attention to the next response!]
“ That’s…that’s…(raising his voice) way too conspiratorial. (his voice,
still raising in intensity) Look! Just imagine Al Gore was president
when 911 Happened! If George Bush was not in there we would not have
declared war on the al-Qaeda! We would have not taken the Taliban down!
And there would have been tens of thousands more Dead Americans!
That’s how I determine my politics! I don’t determine them by getting
on the internet and finding some international organization!”

[The Permanent Revolution is a continuous process of War, Revolution and
Terror.] If you notice from the above quote Horowitz determines his
politics by waging war and predicting future terror. And still Horowitz
will not acknowledge or even address the existence of the IDU. Instead
he yells conspiracy!]

“But I found this information in the newspapers and the Wall Street

Horowitz (now very agitated):
“The United States is part of the UN. It’s a left wing organization.
The US is in the UN, does that make the US left wing? The UN is always
denouncing the United States, Britain and Israel. That’s their business
these days.”

[Authors note: Just a few minutes ago Horowitz acknowledged a severe 40
year leftward drift in American politics.]

Question and statement (with a slight chuckle):
“OK, I’m glad you brought that up! If the UN is a left wing
organization, then why is the Republican Party pushing International
Free Trade, which is a left wing policy? (my voice rising trying to be
heard over the loud protestations of Horowitz), I can even back that up
with Hamilton’s “Essay #12” from The Federalist Papers.”

Horowitz (successfully drowning out my efforts):
“Ah Look! I encounter people like you all the time. Politics is a
complex business, OK? (speed of elocution picks up), You don’t get to be
morally pure on everything! Just because the US doesn’t get out of the
UN doesn’t make it a left wing party.”

[Author’s note: I don’t wear “brown-shirt” khakis and I definitely do
not have pictures of Hitler on my walls. And don’t forget Horowitz said
there was no difference between Kennedy and Reagan. This is a good
indication America just may be well left of the perceived American
political center.]

Horowitz (quickly changing to an apologetic and condescending tone):
“ I know I am on a religious station. Politics is the art of the
possible, not the ideal! There is a big difference between politics and
religion. Religion is about getting into heaven and if you mess with
the Devil you're damned. In politics… politics is about getting into
office! You make pacts with the devil all the time putting together a
majority coalition to allow you to rule!”

End of interview.

Horowitz, just like Anne Coulter, denied knowing of the International
Democratic Union, but did not hesitate to label something he didn’t know
about a conspiracy theory. Again there are only two possible reasons for
this. One is Horowitz didn’t know of the IDU. But, how could a man,
who had been summoned to George Bush’s presence, to discuss electoral
strategy (a man claiming to have authored the Republican manual for
election strategy) have not known about the June 10th, 2002 White House
hosting of an IDU election strategy session that was covered by the
Associated Press? Something is grossly wrong here. Which leads to the
second reason. Horowitz does know about the IDU and does not want the
rank and file Republican to know about it.

There may be a reason for Mr. Horowitz’s “ignorance” of the IDU.
Horowitz does know about the Permanent Revolution. This he cannot deny.
There is a section of How to Defeat the Democrats dedicated to “The
Unrepentant Left.” In “Chapter 4,” on page 199, Horowitz vents his
anger at a member of the radical left. It goes like this:

“Far from renouncing her communist and terrorist past, Boudin is part of
the same radical network that fuels Linda Evans’ seditious projects and
remains an integeral part of the permanent revolution both signed onto
in the 1960s.”

The use of the term permanent revolution, was not some idle choice of
vitriolic rhetoric to demean the radical left. Horowitz knew exactly
what he was writing. One only has to turn to his 1969 epic Empire and
Revolution.   A series of footnotes at the bottom of pages 28, 29 and 30
reveals “the alter ego” of Horowitz.

“Lenin referred to ‘uninterrupted’ or ‘continuous’ revolution rather
than ‘permanent revolution,’ which had been revived as a term by Parvus
and Trotsky.” (p. 28.)

“The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionizing the
instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and
with them the whole relations of society.” (p.29.)

“Capitalist production according to Marx and Engels had centralized
population and industry and concentrated property in a few hands. The
‘necessary consequence’ of this was political centralization.
‘Independent, or but loosely connected provinces, with separate
interests, laws, governments and systems of taxation, became lumped
together into one nation, with one government, one code of laws, one
national class-interest, one frontier and one customs-tariff.” (p. 30.)

David Horowitz knows of the existence of the Permanent Revolution.
Like any other conflict of man there are at least two sides in the
struggle. In the case of the Permanent Revolution the combatants have
been Worker Socialists (The Third Way) and Corporate Socialists (today’s
International Democrat Union). In his youth Horowitz was very active
and a leader of The Third Way. In his maturity Horowitz deserted his
Worker Socialist “brothers” in Permanent Revolution and switched sides
to the Corporate Socialist cause, now his “new brothers in Permanent

Like his days in The Third Way, to couch his communism and shun his
allegiance to America, Horowitz now hides his communism behind a
conservative “cloak” of new found Americanism in the form of World
Conservatism. But for some reason Horowitz, The Republican National
Committee and the Republican Party do not want the rank and file members
of the party to know the concept of “compassionate conservatism” comes
from the International Democrat Union, just another Fabian Socialist
front group helping to transform Capitalism into Communism.

Just a few last comments. Please consider all the things Horowitz did
say. He compared the perceived conservative Ronald Reagan to a 1960s
very liberal Democrat and graduate of the Fabian Socialist London School
of Economics, John F. Kennedy. Horowitz acknowledged a severe leftward
drift in American politics. And most damning of all, in order for the
Republican “Third Kind” to rule (not get elected) they must consistently
“make pacts with the Devil”.

These “Third Kind” ideas are most definitely alien to Christian,
Patriotic, Conservative Americans.   It is time for the people of this
Republic to acknowledge the Republican Party is just another Communist
front organization of the Permanent Revolution (the dialectical
evolution of Capitalism into Communism).   

Terry Hayfield’s email address: catzm-@aol.com

The two previous articles Network America carried which were BASED on
the Hayfield research, but not written by him, were: "What is the
Hayfield Research? You'd better find out", carried April 9, 2000; it can
be found here:


the other was "Only Six Corporations Dominate Major Media Outlets"
carried on May 6, 2000. It can be found here:


End of the first Hayfield article in this series of four.

End of this e-wire.

Jim Condit Jr.,
Director, Network America Ewire List
Director, Citizens for a Fair Vote Count
 Previous Message All Messages Next Message 
  Check It Out!

  Topica Channels
 Best of Topica
 Art & Design
 Books, Movies & TV
 Food & Drink
 Health & Fitness
 News & Information
 Personal Finance
 Personal Technology
 Small Business
 Travel & Leisure
 Women & Family

  Start Your Own List!
Email lists are great for debating issues or publishing your views.
Start a List Today!

© 2001 Topica Inc. TFMB
Concerned about privacy? Topica is TrustE certified.
See our Privacy Policy.