|
Parental Intelligence - Issue 58
|
Bob Collier
|
Sep 07, 2003 22:50 PDT
|
-------------------PARENTAL INTELLIGENCE------------------
8 September 2003
Issue 58
Bob Collier, Editor mailto:quauss-@hotmail.com
This newsletter is never sent unsolicited. You are
receiving it because you requested a subscription, or it
has been forwarded to you by a friend.
If you're not a subscriber and you'd like to subscribe,
please either visit
http://www.topica.com/lists/pintel
or send a blank email to:
pintel-s-@topica.com
If you want to unsubscribe for any reason, please see the
unsubscribe instructions at the end of this newsletter.
Welcome to Parental Intelligence!
"The world's No.1 email newsletter for thinking parents"
Being a bloke, I probably don't cover aspects of parenting
that are distinctly 'women's issues', if that's the right
phrase, as much as I could (don't be shy about suggesting
topics you'd like me to explore, by the way!). This week,
however, I've got an article for you from last week's Website
Of The Week - The Imperfect Parent - that takes a humorous
and highly informative look at the subject of breastfeeding -
Stacey Greenberg's 'A Call to Arms and Breasts'. Read it
carefully - she'll be asking questions afterwards! :D
In The Candlelight Project this week, discover something of
the real story behind the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders (or 'DSM'), a publication of the American
Psychiatric Association that's often referred to as the
'bible of psychiatry'.
Finally, a little serendipity in Doug Bench's Brain Stuff.
As you know, one of the permanent links in my newsletter is
to Win Wenger's 'Project Renaissance' website. Reading
through some early issues of the 'Neuroscience Self-
Motivation Newsletter' a couple of days ago, I discovered a
review of one of Dr. Wenger's books. Read what Doug Bench has
to say about 'The Einstein Factor' at the tail end of this
week's Parental Intelligence.
Thanks for reading. Have a great week until next time!
Bob
============================================================
Would you like to help my newsletter grow? Simply recommend
Parental Intelligence to all your friends who have children.
They'll thank you for it!
Why not hit that 'forward' button right now?
My goal is 2,000 subscribers by 31st December 2003. This
week's Parental Intelligence is going out to 151 smart
people.
Thank you!
============================================================
************************************************************
A FREE GIFT FOR PARENTAL INTELLIGENCE READERS
For a limited time Parental Intelligence would like to give
you a free introductory copy of byronchild, a new Australian
magazine created especially for progressive families which,
like Parental Intelligence, supports the propagation of
intelligent information for parents. Simply email
ka-@byronpublications.com with your name and address and a
free magazine will be sent to you. See more about byronchild
at http://byronchild.com
************************************************************
------------------------------------------------------------
THE CANDLELIGHT PROJECT
The American Psychiatric Association's 'Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders' (or 'DSM') is often
referred to as the 'bible of psychiatry'. I'd never heard of
it less than a year ago, but these days I tend to refer to
it as the Psychiatrist's Joke Book. The following
information about this wonder of modern literature may
provide you with one or two clues as to why I do that!
I found this first item on file but with no reference, and I
don't recall now where I got it from. If anybody recognizes
it, please let me know so that I can properly attribute it
to its source.
------------------------------
IS THE DSM-IV SCIENCE OR POLITICS?
According to Paula J. Caplan, a clinical and research
psychologist at the Ontario Institute for Studies in
Education and lecturer at the University of Toronto, the DSM
(Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
Fourth Edition, published by the American Psychiatric
Association) "is a guide that most psychiatrists, therapists,
and social workers use to determine not only what care will
be covered by insurers, but who, in effect, may be
hospitalized against their will and who may be judged
incompetent or too disturbed to rear their own children. On
a more day-to-day level, the DSM determines how millions of
people feel about themselves once they are labeled
psychologically 'abnormal.' And yet this powerful manual,
recently released in its fourth edition, is constructed by a
small clique in the psychiatric establishment...."
Ms. Caplan has written a book called They Say You're Crazy,
(Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1995). Ms. Caplan writes,
"My primary focus in this book...is on how the most powerful
mental health enterprise in the world - the American
Psychiatric Association - is defining abnormality, mental
illness, or mental disorder..." "The point is not that
decisions about who is normal are riddled with personal
biases and political consideration but rather that, by dint
of a handful of influential professionals' efforts, those
subjective determinants of diagnoses masquerade as solid
science and truth."
Ms. Caplan quotes Donald Godwin, chairman and professor in
the Dept. of Psychiatry at the University of Kansas: "Like
all semireligious works, DSM-III needs an exegesis."
She laments the fact that "the tendency to accept high-
status medical scientists' and practitioners' words as truth
is still widespread." Reviewer, Carol Tavris, Ph.D. says,
"Paula Caplan has written a lively, marvelous insider's
story of how psychiatric diagnoses are invented - how
subjective, political, and personal agendas are dressed up
in the lab coats of science and offered to the public as
'truth.' Mental-health professionals need to read this book
to cure themselves of Delusional Scientific Diagnosing
Disorder, and the public needs to read it for self-
protection."
Another book also reveals how the DSM is more politics than
science. Written by Stuart Kirk and Herb Kutchins, The
Selling of the DSM, The Rhetoric of Science in Psychiatry,
(Aldine De Gruyter, New York, 1992) is a "well-documented
exposé of the pretense that psychiatric diagnoses are the
names of genuine diseases and the authentication of this
fraud by an unholy alliance of the media, the government,
and psychiatry," according to psychiatrist, Dr. Thomas Szasz
of the State University of New York.
The next time a psychotherapist refers to the DSM as an
authoritative source of diagnostic information, refer him to
these two works. You need not be intimidated by the
pronouncements of scientific pretenders.
------------------------------
There is, I've discovered, an alternative to the DSM. It's
published by the World Health Organization and called the
'International Statistical Classification of Diseases and
Related Health Problems'.
This week, I asked Barry Turner, a Lecturer in Law at the
University of Lincoln in the UK and a previous contributor
to The Candlelight Project, about the relationship between
the two publications. This is his reply:
------------------------------
Bob
The WHO ICD-10 is the main classification for psychiatric
disorders but the DSM has usurped it mainly by better
marketing. The DSM is of course the handbook for the
American Psychiatric Association, that wonderful
organisation that thinks that paedophiles should not be
listed as disordered but that naughty children should.
(Some psychiatrists have linked ADHD type behaviours to
child abuse, so another way of looking at the APA's view is
that the perpetrators should be classed as normal but their
victims as disordered.)
In the ICD which is similar to the DSM in its diagnostic
criteria there is a wonderful comment on ADHD and I quote
"These conditions are not yet included in the main
classification because of insufficient empirical predictive
validation".
The DSM grows every year as the APA meet to invent new
psychiatric disorders. Within the next five years every
human emotion and action that can be affected by SSRI's or
psychostimulants will be classed as a symptom of some
disorder or other.
No one is greedy, shy, selfish, rude, arrogant, aggressive
or impulsive any more, even showing strong positive emotions
like love and affection are considered a disorder by the
APA.
Needless to say, it is not the human desire to learn
evermore about ourselves that is driving this hideous
distortion of medical science. A remarkable observation
about all of these new disorders is the fact that in nearly
every case there is a drug already on the market to "treat"
them. It is no coincidence that the APA want the
paraphillias removed from the DSM-IV, there is no
psychopharmacological treatment available that controls
paedophiles, so there is no money in it.
This hideously distorted and grossly magnified branch of
medical science is driven entirely by profit and the super
inflated egos of the APA board.
There is not one piece of objective, empirically validated
scientific evidence to support the ever increasing array of
psychiatric disorders. Modern psychiatry is a belief system
more closely related to a pseudo-religious cult than a
science. The tenets of the belief are dictated by a handful
of self appointed psych gurus whose main purpose seems to be
self enrichment.
Many psychiatrists as physicians are in breach of all four
of the fundamental medical ethics. Patient autonomy is
totally disregarded with some psychiatrists showing a marked
contempt for the welfare and feelings of patients.
Beneficence, the concept of doing good by your patients,
falls by the wayside, usually accompanied by platitudes of
societal greater good (which incidentally contradicts the
Hippocratic oath as well as all modern protocols on medical
ethics).
Non-Maleficence, the fundamental ethic of "first do no harm",
is disregarded completely. Dangerous psychopharmaceutical
products are applied willy-nilly. The sometimes terrible side
effects are brushed aside as a necessary evil that the
patient must put up with. Often it is not even believed
necessary that those unfortunate enough to have the drugs
forced on them should be warned about the side effects.
Electric shocks and even the mediaeval practice of
psychosurgery are used.
Justice, the last of the ethics, comes in nowhere.
Psychiatric patients receive shabby treatment that would not
be tolerated in general medicine, because no one will listen
if they complain. Dirty drugs, disrespectful, even insulting
treatment can be meted out and if a patient complains or
refuses to put up with it, it is dismissed as being
"symptomatic of their illness".
Modern psychiatry is a sham. Many of its practitioners are
no better than fairground snake oil salesmen or cult leaders
exploiting people for profit.
The DSM is not worth the paper it is printed on.
* p. 292, ICD-10: DCR-10
Regards
Barry
------------------------------
Finally, this week, what seems to me to be a classic example
of the shenanigans behind the DSM. This is an extract from a
booklet published by the Citizens Commission on Human Rights
called "Re-defining Life's Every Problem as a Mental
Disorder":
"In 1973, APA committee members voted - 5,584 to 3,810 - to
cease calling homosexuality a mental disorder after gay
activists picketed the APA conferences.
Attorney Lawrence Stevens comments: "If mental illness were
really an illness in the same sense that physical illnesses
are illnesses, the idea of deleting homosexuality or
anything else from the categories of illness by having a
vote would be as absurd as a group of physicians voting to
delete cancer or measles from the concept of disease.""
Quite so.
------------------------------------------------------------
"Is psychiatry a hoax - as practiced today? Unfortunately,
the answer is mostly yes." - Loren R. Mosher, M.D., a former
official of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH),
in his letter of resignation to the American Psychiatric
Association.
------------------------------------------------------------
If you're not up to speed with the Candlelight Project and
would like to read about it from the beginning, please
visit the following web page and read from Parental
Intelligence Issue 49:
http://www.topica.com/lists/pintel/read
If you'd like to read The Parental Intelligence Report on
'ADHD', published May 2003, please send a blank email to:
pire-@getresponse.com
To discover more of the truth about 'ADHD', please visit:
ADHD Fraud
http://www.adhdfraud.org/
Death From Ritalin
http://www.ritalindeath.com/
A.S.P.I.R.E.
http://www.aspire.us/
Wildest Colts Make the Best Horses
(Download a free copy of "A Colt of a Booklet" while you're
there!)
http://www.wildestcolts.com/
Citizens Commission on Human Rights
http://www.cchr.org/
Able Child - Parents for Label and Drug Free Education
http://ablechild.org/
Fight For Kids
http://www.fightforkids.org/
See you next week on the Candlelight Trail!
************************************************************
************************************************************
LIVING FREE
HOW TO BEAT THE SYSTEM - AND GROW RICH
by Phil Gosling - "Britain's most successful author
no-one's ever heard of".
Read Part One AND Part Two of this totally revised and
updated Millennium Edition of one of the best-selling
educational courses of the early 1990s ABSOLUTELY FREE.
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!
Please visit:
http://www.1shoppingcart.com/app/aftrack.asp?afid=74710
************************************************************
A Call to Arms and Breasts
Are you a Lactivist?
by Stacey Greenberg
When I was in high school, I knew people who stood on the
corner across from the mall holding signs that read, "Fur
is dead." Friends in college joined local chapters of
Amnesty International and attended war protests. I was
interested in volunteerism and serving the community, but I
never really considered myself an activist. I didn't feel
really passionate about any one thing. I was more of a "go
with the flow" type of person. I started working at a soup
kitchen after buying a fake i.d. from the volunteer
coordinator; I joined the Peace Corps after seeing "Dirty
Dancing" in the theater five times and learning of Baby's
plans; I decided to get a Masters Degree after a friend
told me about an interesting program; and then an
internship turned into well-paying job helping people. I
married a man I met in the Peace Corps, bought a house, got
some dogs, and planted a garden. I just did my thing and
everything seemed to work out fine for me.
When I became pregnant, everything changed. I wasn't
comfortable with status quo regarding pregnancy and birth.
The time I spent in Cameroon, West Africa, as a Peace Corps
volunteer had affected me in ways that I hadn't realized. I
had never considered the politics of parenting in our
country until a friend started midwifery school and opened
my eyes to a world I never knew existed. I suddenly found
it difficult to just go with the flow. I found that the
ideas I had for myself didn't mesh with the ideas of the
people around me, especially my family. I found that every
decision I made, starting with my homebirth, was challenged.
I found myself in a position of either keeping my decisions
to myself or working hard to educate others on why I was
choosing to be "different". I chose the latter.
On April 21, 2002, I gave birth to one son and one mother. I
saw this as a chance to start over, to live purposefully,
and to think about my actions.
When it comes to parenting, I try to shield myself from
negative messages and images that pervade most mainstream
media. For instance, I do not watch shows like "Maternity
Ward" or even the seemingly benign "A Baby Story" on TLC. I
quit watching "Friends" after Rachel's ridiculous and
completely unrealistic birth episode. I don't read the
parenting magazines in the pediatrician's office and I
recycle the formula companies' advertising rags parading as
"magazines" that appear in my mailbox. I'm not interested in
what Dr. This or Dr. That has to say about everything that
could go wrong in my pregnancy, my child's first years, etc.
I like to talk to real people, read zines (self-published
"mini" magazines), and do my own research. I belong to a few
"alternative" online parenting communities and I have tried
to build a strong support network for myself in my community.
This has made a huge impact on my life and given me the
confidence to parent in the style that suits my family.
I don't like it when people give me unsolicited advice and I
disagree with a lot of commonly accepted/unquestioned
practices. In addition to having a homebirth, I did not
circumcise my Jewish son, I don't vaccinate, I cosleep, and
I plan to breastfeed until my son decides he is ready to
wean. I know that these things may make me seem like a
hippie (or worse), but I'm probably not that different from
you. I doubt you could pick me out of a crowd. If it is a
weekend, my avocado stained "Lactivist" tee shirt, pulled up
over my breast, with my insanely cute 15-month-old son
attached to my nipple might give me away.
What the hell is a lactivist, you ask? A lactivist is a
lactation activist: someone who considers him/herself an
advocate for breastfeeding, whether or not s/he's nursed.
Lactivism comes in many forms: choosing to breastfeed,
choosing to breastfeed for an extended period of time,
choosing to breastfeed in public, choosing to smile at a
breastfeeding woman, encouraging other women to breastfeed,
educating the public on the benefits of breastfeeding,
lobbying for pro-breastfeeding legislation, etc. Maybe
you're already a lactivist, and didn't know it.
The United States has made some major strides in the past
couple of decades. Formula companies have been required by
law to state on their products and in their ads that "breast
milk is best". Laws have been passed requiring employers to
provide time and space for women to express milk at work.
Breastfeeding is slowly but surely coming back in fashion,
even celebrities are doing it. However, breastfeeding rates
are still alarmingly low and in general, breastfeeding is
viewed as primarily for babies. Close your eyes and think
about breastfeeding. What image comes to mind? A smiling
woman holding a newborn infant? Well, I have news for you,
breastfeeding isn't just for babies. Toddlers and older
children do it too.
The American Association of Pediatricians (AAP) recommends
exclusive breastfeeding for six months and continuing
breastfeeding for at least one year, while The World Health
Organization (WHO) and UNICEF advocate breastfeeding for two
years and beyond. There is no agreed upon world average age
for weaning, but many cultural studies detail a weaning
continuum from birth to ten years (do not adjust your
glasses). The United States is one of the only countries to
wean its children by their first birthday. It is up to each
nursing duo to decide when it is time to wean. Some women
choose to breastfeed for six months, some for two years,
some for four or more, and some not at all. To each her own,
I say. However, women in this country need to be given more
information and more support.
I doubt there's a person out there who hasn't heard a
sensationalized news story about "the horrors" of a woman
nursing her three year old child. Extended nursing is often
portrayed as a form of child abuse or a sign of the mother's
unfulfilled emotional needs. (If it isn't an extended
nursing story it's a story about a child sleeping in his/her
parents bed, but that's a different rant.) Stories like
those make me angry and sad. They discourage others from
nursing their children past an "acceptable" age or encourage
them to hide their nursing relationship. This serves to
reinforce the image of breastfeeding being for tiny newborns
only. For those of us choosing to nurse our children for a
year or more, we must be proud and we must be seen.
I wish that all the women out there who are nursing their
infants, toddlers, and older children could feel safe to
join me in public displays of nursing. I want lactating women
everywhere to nurse their children wherever and whenever they
want and for it to be perceived as completely normal and
natural. It can happen and it starts with me and you.
Lactivists unite!
Copyright 2003 The Imperfect Parent, All Rights Reserved
http://www.imperfectparent.com
Are you a Lactivist? Take the quiz!
1. Why do women breastfeed?
a. Because they enjoy getting horrified stares in public.
b. Because bottles are too hard to keep track of.
c. Because it's provides excellent nutrition for the baby
and aids in building a healthy attachment to the mother.
2. How do you know your newborn baby is getting enough
breast milk?
a. Breast milk alone is not sufficient, you must supplement
with formula.
b. Weigh him/her on a scale before and after feedings.
c. Pay attention to your baby's cues and the contents of
his/her diapers.
3. When is the best time to wean your child?
a. At birth.
b. At one year.
c. Whenever you and/or your child feel it is mutually
beneficial.
4. Where is the best place to nurse?
a. At home, in your bedroom, with the curtains drawn.
b. In a discreet location, like a bathroom.
c. Wherever you damned well please!
5. If someone says something inappropriate or judgmental to
you while you're nursing in public....
a. Listen to them.
b. Squirt milk in their eye.
c. Inform them that it is your legal right to nurse in
public and that you are feeding and caring for your
child.
6. What does breast milk taste like?
a. Ew!
b. Like cow's milk?
c. Mild, sweet, and delicious.
7. Who benefits from breastfeeding?
a. Formula Companies.
b. Babies.
c. Mothers, Fathers, Babies, and Society as a whole.
8. What's the best way to deal with a nursling who bites?
a. When a baby has teeth, it's time to quit nursing!
b. Bite the baby back.
c. Remove him/her from the breast while sternly saying no.
9. You're nursing your easily distracted toddler in the
mall. Something catches her eye, and she pops off the
breast to see, leaving you bare-breasted and squirting.
You:
a. Are still nursing a toddler?
b. Immediately crawl under your bench and hope death comes
swiftly and soon.
c. Make sure your excited baby doesn't hurl herself on the
floor and then guide her back to nursing.
10. What should you do about nursing your baby after you
return to work?
a. Wean now so your baby will be used to formula.
b. Breastfeeding and working do not mix.
c. Bring your baby to work with you if possible, visit
during the day, or get yourself a high quality breast
pump. (Your work place is legally required to provide a
place for you to express milk.)
11. What do formula companies do to undermine the
breastfeeding process?
a. Mail free formula samples & coupons to pregnant women.
b. Mail free formula samples & coupons to doctors and
hospitals.
c. Publish free magazines with formula ads and coupons on
every page.
d. Mail these magazines to pregnant women, new mothers,
doctors, and hospitals.
e. Perpetuate the image of babies using bottles as natural.
f. Put profits before nutrition.
g. All of the above.
12. What is a Lactivist (Lactation Activist)?
a. Someone who breastfeeds.
b. Someone who breastfeeds in public.
c. Someone who smiles at a breastfeeding woman.
d. Someone who provides a comfortable place for women to
breastfeed.
e. Someone who educates others on the benefits of
breastfeeding.
f. Someone who lobbies for pro-breastfeeding legislation.
g. All of the above.
Scoring: For questions 1-10 give yourself 0 points for every
a answer, 5 points for every b answer, and 10 points for
every c answer. For questions 11 and 12, give yourself 5
points if you answered a-f and 10 points if you answered g.
100+ Congratulations! You are a Lactivist! You are well
informed on the benefits & politics of breastfeeding and
believe that breast is best! Time to order your Lactivist
t-shirt and tell the world!
50-100 You're getting there. Maybe you like the idea of
breastfeeding, but don't fully understand what it entails
and its impact on society. Do some research, talk to women
who breastfeed, and learn more.
0-50 Wake up and smell the breast milk. I hope that this
quiz sparked your curiosity and you will take it upon
yourself to find out what all the hooplah is about.
This quiz was created by Stacey Greenberg. Stacey is a mama
and writer living in Memphis, Tennessee. She publishes a
mama-made zine called Fertile Ground: For People Who Dig
Parenting. Contact her at stal-@yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------
"Nothing is more important in the world today than the
nurturing that children receive in the first three years of
life, for it is in these earliest years that the capacities
for trust, empathy, and affection originate." - Dr. Elliott
Barker
------------------------------------------------------------
DOUG BENCH'S BRAIN STUFF
BOOK REVIEW
THE EINSTEIN FACTOR, Win (could he have a better first name)
Wenger, PhD and Richard Poe
This book, published in 1996, is a culmination of 25 years
of the author's research on brain-based accelerative
learning. SO YOU KNOW I LOVE IT! Particularly good is the
book's summary on how the brain works (the first several
chapters). Also excellent is the author's treatment of what
we call "Innerstates". That is what we say to ourselves.
This is covered in Chapter 8 of the book: "Model Thinking".
Also FANTASTIC, if you want to, as we say in our seminar
brochure, "Be years ahead of your competition!", are the
contents of Chapter Nine: "Total Recall" and Chapter 14:
"Use the Force". THIS BOOK IS A MUST READ! It can help guide
you towards usage of much more than the average person's
'brain-power'! RATING: 9+
Learn the SCIENCE of PERMANENT Self-Motivation. So you
don't have to go back again and again and again, and spend
more and more and more money for a short term fix!
Scientific facts do not lie and do not fail, and neither
will you! Guaranteed!
*** 7 Mini-Science Lessons for Maxi-Success ***
This Course is FREE, and a great starting point for you to
run toward the Science of Permanent Self-Motivation.
Subscribe to the 7 Mini-Science Lessons for Maxi-Success
course and to Doug Bench's free Neuroscience Self-Motivation
News at his Science for Success website:
http://www.mcssl.com/app/aftrack.asp?afid=69141
AUDIO has been added to Science for Success website!
Doug Bench has added Audio examples of nearly all of his
Systems and Tools to his website.
Go check it out now! Everywhere that you see the
Green 'Play' Button, you can hear a helpful sample of that
Tool.
http://www.mcssl.com/app/aftrack.asp?afid=69141
------------------------------------------------------------
PROJECTS OF INTEREST
The Natural Child Project
Parent, homeschooler, author and psychologist Jan Hunt
shares her vision of the world in which all children are
treated with dignity, respect, understanding and compassion.
http://www.naturalchild.org/
The Parenting Project
A non-profit organization founded in 1995 by parent advocate
and mother of three Suzy Garfinkle Chevrier working to bring
parenting, empathy and nurturing skills education to all
school age children and teens.
http://www.parentingproject.org/
Project HappyChild
Penny Rollo Midas' extraordinary extravaganza of resources
for children and parents. Started in 1998, it's now more
than 7,000 pages and still growing!
http://www.happychild.org.uk/
Project Renaissance
Creative thinking pioneer Win Wenger's core mission is to
enable as many human beings as possible to become more than
a match for the situations, opportunities and problems or
difficulties that they find around them, and to enjoy a
richer quality of life and experience.
http://www.winwenger.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
I hope you've enjoyed this issue of Parental Intelligence!
Issue 59 will be published on 15 September 2003
PLEASE RECOMMEND PARENTAL INTELLIGENCE TO ALL YOUR FRIENDS
WHO HAVE CHILDREN - THEY'LL THANK YOU FOR IT!
Do you have any comments or suggestions? Would you
like to contribute an article?
mailto:quauss-@hotmail.com
Please include the words "Parental Intelligence" in the
subject line.
This newsletter is never sent unsolicited. You are
receiving it because you requested a subscription, or it
has been forwarded to you by a friend.
If you're not a subscriber and you'd like to subscribe,
please either visit
http://www.topica.com/lists/pintel
or send a blank email to:
pintel-s-@topica.com
If you want to unsubscribe for any reason, please see the
unsubscribe instructions at the end of this newsletter.
Copyright (c) 2003, Bob Collier except where indicated
otherwise.
Published by:
Bob Collier
3 Goldie Place
Kambah
CANBERRA
ACT 2902
Australia
mailto:quauss-@hotmail.com
Have a happy and successful day!
------------------------------------------------------------
"Who is this bloke?" Find out more about the publisher of
Parental Intelligence by sending a blank email to:
bobco-@getresponse.com
------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
 |
|
