|
FOS Newsletter, 11/9/01
|
Peter Suber
|
Nov 09, 2001 08:38 PST
|
Welcome to the Free Online Scholarship (FOS) Newsletter
November 9, 2001
Starting with this issue, I'm using MakeAShorterLink.com to shorten very
long URLs. It's a useful service, elegantly implemented. This will
prevent the wrapping of long URLs, which in some applications prevents
users from clicking through. I hope it saves you from cutting and pasting.
http://makeashorterlink.com/
----------
Free online scholarly blogs
A web log (or weblog, hence blog) is a chronological list of the editor's
postings with the most recent on top. Typically a blog shows only a week's
worth on one screen, with the rest in a searchable archive. Some blogs are
individual diaries, some are devoted to news in a certain niche, some are
like newsletters published one date-stamped item at a time. Some blogs are
produced by one individual and some have many contributors. All are
free. There is now intuitive software to make blogs easy to create and
maintain.
If you haven't used blogs to follow developments in a certain corner of the
world (electronic publishing, libraries, you name it), you're in for a
pleasant surprise. They've become very useful tools.
The useful blogs today tend to cover news in some fairly narrow
professional beat, political bloc, or product market. But there's no
reason why they couldn't cover news in a scholarly discipline.
Two good examples of scholarly blogs are GeoBlog, maintained by Fred
Siewers, and the Biological Science blog from the BigBlog family of
blogs. When there is news of interest to geologists or biologists, these
blog editors log a note with a link. Geologists or biologists can visit
the sites periodically to see what's going on. Both blogs cover both
popular and scholarly sources (and both could enrich the mix with more
scholarly sources). Both are useful to working scientists and should
inspire imitators in other fields.
In the back of my mind, one of my models here is John Baez, professor of
mathematics at the University of California, Riverside. Baez reads current
journal articles in mathematical physics and cross-posts his summaries and
thoughts to four usenet newsgroups (sci.physics.research,
sci.math.research, sci.physics, and sci.math). He's been doing this nearly
every week for more than three years. He doesn't run a blog, but anybody
willing to do what he's doing could make a terrific blog. Why doesn't
every field have a John Baez (or two, or ten), reading current articles and
posting summaries and thoughts to a blog for other researchers in the field?
GeoBlog
http://www.geoblog.blogspot.com/
Biological Science Blog
http://bigblog.com/biological_science.html
John Baez, This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/TWF.html
* Other scholarly blogs
Archaeology and ancient history
http://julen.net/ancient/breaking.html
BigBlog family of blogs
http://bigblog.com/
(Arts and Culture, general science, robotics, space science.)
Il blog di it.scienza.chimica
http://utenti.tripod.it/itscichem/ChemBlog/blogger.html
Virtual Sky Blog
http://virtualsky.org/blogshow.asp
(Links and annotations to various pages of the Virtual Sky, a simulation of
the actual sky. Not on astronomy in general.)
* Blogging in general
Cindy Curling, A Closer Look at Weblogs
http://www.llrx.com/columns/notes46.htm
(A very good introduction to blogs.)
Finding blogs on a given topic
http://wz.com/internet/Blogs.html
http://www.blogfinder.com/
http://www.jjg.net/portal/tpoowl.html
Making your own blog
Blogger, http://www.blogger.com/ (free tools, free hosting)
Weblogger, http://www.weblogger.com/ (free tools, unfree hosting)
Spyonit
http://www.spyonit.com/Home
(Sic this alert service on a blog to be notified by email when it is updated.)
----------
Adobe says "licensed", court says "sold"
Softman Products runs BuyCheapSoftware.com, a web site that unbundles Adobe
software "Collections" and sells the pieces separately. This enables
buyers to buy, install, and use the individual programs without seeing or
clicking assent to Adobe's licensing agreement. When Adobe found out about
this practice, it sued Softman for infringing its trademarks and
copyrights. In August a federal district court issued a temporary
restraining order against Softman, but in October it lifted the order and
ruled that Softman is acting within its rights as a purchaser.
The case is about software, not scholarship, but many of the court's
arguments extend to scholarly texts and other forms of intellectual
property. The court ruled that Adobe "sold" copies of its software to
Softman and didn't merely "license" them. The fact that Adobe used
licensing language to describe the transaction is irrelevant. What matters
is the substance of the transaction itself. Softman paid full value for
the software; Softman accepted the risk that it would be damaged or lost;
and Softman accepted the risk that it would be unable to resell it. These
are the hallmarks of a sale.
Adobe didn't sell its intellectual property, but it did sell
copies. Adobe's insistence that it owns the intellectual property is
therefore beside the point. If Softman bought copies of the software from
Adobe and didn't merely license them, then it has the right to dispose of
them in any way that it sees fit. In short, the "first sale doctrine"
applies to copies of Adobe software.
Quoting Judge Pregerson: "Adobe seeks to control the resale of a lawfully
acquired copy of its software. Adobe’s position in this action would be
more akin to a journalist who claimed that ownership of the copyright to an
article allowed him or her to control the resale of a particular copy of a
newspaper that contained that article."
District court decision in Softman Products v. Adobe Systems
http://makeashorterlink.com/?T16821E1
(The decision is undated but was posted to the court's web site on October
22, 2001.)
BuyCheapSoftware.com
http://www.buycheapsoftware.com/
(No mention of this case at the web site.)
* Postscript. What if this ruling stands and is applied to scholarly
texts? If libraries and consumers are held to "buy" rather than "license"
ebooks, ejournals, and ejournal articles, then they should be within their
rights to bypass copy protection, make back-up copies, make copies to run
on their other computers, and keep their copies in readable form (tweaked
if necessary) in perpetuity without further payments.
* PPS. In trying to find more details and commentary on this case, I hit
the news and law search engines. But even though stories and op-ed pieces
on the case could be old enough to be crawled by the major engines (and
certainly by the frequently refreshed news engines), I've found
nothing. Why is the nerd press ignoring this far-reaching story?
----------
Freedom from the cross-border censorship
A federal district court ruled on November 7 that Yahoo's U.S. web
operations are not bound by French law on the sale of Nazi artifacts, even
though Yahoo auction pages are served to French citizens.
The French argued that a French ruling ought to be binding over what French
citizens may see in France. Yahoo argued that a U.S. company's U.S. web
site should be protected by the U.S. constitution.
To understand why this is good news for FOS, imagine that your online
scholarship about evolution, Chinese history, or sexuality, was enjoined by
courts in Iran, China, or Afghanistan. (See FOSN for 7/3/01.) The
principle behind this case helps all scholars who publish controversial
papers on the web --or at least the 99% for whom there is at least one
country on Earth more oppressive and intolerant than their own.
Decision of the court (November 7, 2001)
http://www.cdt.org/jurisdiction/011107judgement.pdf
(The court has not yet posted its own version of the text. This copy was
scanned by the Center for Democracy and Technology.)
Amicus brief for Yahoo submitted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce,
Commercial Internet Exchange Association, Information Technology
Association of America, U.S. Internet Industry Association, Online
Publishers Association, and the U.S. Council for International Business
http://www.cdt.org/jurisdiction/010813yahoo.pdf
Reuters, Judge: Yahoo not bound by French Nazi Ban
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-7815683.html
AP, Federal Judge rules Yahoo is not subject to French ruling in Nazi
memorabilia case
http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/news/tech/017978.htm
Lisa Guernsey, Court Says France Can't Censor Yahoo Site
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/09/technology/09YAHO.html
Robert MacMillan, Groups Applaud Yahoo Hate Speech Case
http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/172005.html
AP, French anti-racism group objects to U.S. court's Yahoo ruling
http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/news/tech/027461.htm
Doug Isenberg, Struggling with the French Yahoo Nazi-Auction Decision
http://www.gigalaw.com/articles/2001/isenberg-2001-01b-p1.html
(Background on the case written before Wednesday's decision.)
----------
Turning the tables
In earlier issues, we've worried about the commercial exploitation of FOS
(see FOSN for 7/17/01 and 8/7/01). If you put content online for free for
readers, then it's also free for commercial publishers or any other
for-profit vendor who wants to take up your content, repackage it, perhaps
with add-ons, and sell it.
Now commercial providers are worried about the inverse problem. If they
put up content supported by advertising or subscription fees, then (as long
as it isn't hidden behind passwords) it will be copied and made available
free of charge by Google's cache system (FOSN for 10/12/01) or the Wayback
Machine's internet archive (FOSN for 10/26/01).
Commercial providers are worrying...
http://www.contentbiz.com/sample.cfm?contentID=1871
(Scroll down to the fifth story.)
There's an interesting symmetry here. Free content can be repackaged and
sold by commercial publishers. Priced content can be repackaged and given
away by FOS providers.
Here are two differences that break the symmetry. First, when free content
has been repackaged for purchase, and when priced content has been
repackaged for free distribution, then most users will prefer the free
versions of both kinds of content. Or at least it would take significant
add-ons to persuade users to buy content they could get for free. This is
the asymmetry that will help FOS in the long run. If we can convert lead
to gold and gold to lead, most people will prefer gold.
Second, Google and the Wayback Machine let commercial providers tag their
sites so that they are not cached or archived. Hence, commercial providers
can stop free distribution at their own initiative, but there is no
comparable step that FOS providers can take to stop commercial
exploitation. They can copyright their content and refuse permission to
reprint it for profit. But this requires monitoring, negotiation,
confrontation, and lawsuits, not just a metatag.
Copyright helps each side symmetrically block the other. Clearly FOS
providers can use copyright to stop commercial exploitation. For the other
direction, see Katharine Mieszkowski's November 2 article for _Salon_, in
which she speculates on the copyright and other legal troubles that might
arise for the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. Online newspapers that
charge for access to back issues will soon find that the Wayback Machine
gives free online access to all. "The testy members of the National
Writers Union [vindicated by the Supreme Court in _Tasini_] may also view
the archive as an unauthorized and uncompensated republishing of their
work. There's also the tricky question of what happens if a settlement in
a lawsuit requires that libelous material be removed from a Web site, yet
the original lives on in the archive?"
http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2001/11/02/wayback/index.html
----------
Developments
* The entire population of Iceland now has a license to access over 2,000
electronic journals from six publishers. (PS: This an interesting
hybrid. It's unfree in the obvious sense that Iceland paid money for the
national license. But for Icelanders, it's government subsidized, like
NASA's Astrophysics Data System, the National Library of Medicine, and much
other content that Americans call FOS.)
http://www.swetsblackwell.com/newsdetail.asp?id=54
* Ingenta, which calls itself the world's largest online database of
scientific literature, has become profitable sooner than expected. Its
revenue comes from fees paid by publishers for electronic versions of their
print journals, and from fees paid by readers to download
articles. Ingenta-funded research shows that "by switching to online
distribution, publisher royalties and revenue could increase by 38%"
--presumably by not passing the savings on to subscribers.
Ingenta press release on profitability
http://makeashorterlink.com/?S10C3602
Ingenta
http://www.ingenta.com/
* The California Digital Library (CDL) will discontinue its version of
Medline on December 19. The CDL version was originally called Melvyl
Medline Plus and, more recently, CDL Medline/HealthSTAR. After December
19, CDL users will access Medline through PubMed.
http://www.library.ucsf.edu/db/pubmed/
* The new USA PATRIOT Act allows secret searches, not only of your home and
office but of your library borrowing records. These searches can be secret
in the sense that the authorities need not tell you that the search ever
took place. The American Library Association's Office for Intellectual
Freedom, in consultation with the Freedom to Read Foundation, has put
together legal advice for librarians who are served with subpoenas to turn
over the borrowing records of patrons without informing those patrons.
http://www.ala.org/alaorg/oif/alertusapatriotact.html
* The search for extra-terrestrial intelligence (SETI) harnesses the spare
desktop CPU cycles of thousands of volunteers to create a massively
parallel virtual computer for scientific computations. But now
post-terrorist paranoia may limit the effectiveness of this exciting
technology. Swedish Public Radio has banned the software from its machines
because there's no way to tell what job the computations are really
performing. It might be the scientific search for extra-terrestrial
intelligence, or it might be a terrorist's calculation of missile ballistics.
Jakt på rymdliv säkerhetsrisk?
http://www.sr.se/ekot/index.asp?article=22761
(In Swedish. My English summary is based on Ulf Hedlund's email to Declan
McCullagh's Politech list.)
http://www.politechbot.com/p-02772.html
SETI @ home
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/
* eZ Publish, an open source content management system from Norway, has
released its desktop edition. eZ Publish is based on PHP (the Apache
programming module) and MySQL.
http://developer.ez.no
* Reciprocal, Inc., a developer of DRM software funded by Microsoft, has
gone out of business.
http://www.econtentmag.com/ecxtra/2001/19.html#2
----------
New on the net
* The source code for the Digital Document Discourse Environment (D3E) is
now available for downloading. D3E is an open source program which creates
a threaded discussion attached to any web page. It's easy to set up and
use and a natural for integrating discussion with any online article or
book or for experimenting with new forms of interactive peer review. "Full
D3E" uses a toolkit to insert navigation links and discussion hooks into
the target document. "Ubiquitous D3E" (which is new) uses unmodified files
in their natural habitat on the web. D3E discussions support multiple
threads, moderators, discussion subscription, searching, email delivery,
HTML within posts, look and feel control, usage statistics, and other
standard features of major discussion forums. D3E is a collaboration of
the Knowledge Media Institute of the UK's Open University and the Center
for LifeLong Learning & Design of the University of Colorado at Boulder.
Digital Document Discourse Environment (project overview, downloadable source)
http://d3e.open.ac.uk/
Ubiquitous D3E (start a D3E discussion of an existing web page)
http://otis.open.ac.uk/ubiq/
Example: D3E discussion of the FOS home page
http://otis.open.ac.uk/ubiq/d3e_discussion.php?url=www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/index.htm&f=26
Example: how the Journal of Interactive Media in Education uses D3E for
interactive peer review
http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/
For a similar free service, see Document Review from QuickTopic.
http://www.takeitoffline.com/cgi-bin/docreviewintro.cgi
* The Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library (EEVL) was originally launched
in 1996 as a free online archive of engineering reports, articles, and
data. This week it was relaunched with a wider scope that includes
mathematics and computing. The new name is the Internet Guide to
Engineering, Mathematics, and Computing, though it still goes by its old
acronym, EEVL. It has one of the most flexible search engines I've seen in
a content portal. You can search the entire archive or limit your search
to any of its many topical sub-sections. You can limit searches by
discipline, by resource type, or by national origin. You can search the
full-texts of the archived articles, or limit the search to authors,
titles, URLs, or descriptions. EEVL is the joint product of a handful of
British universities with funds from JISC.
http://www.eevl.ac.uk/
* The National Library of New Zealand has put online over 300,000 pages
from a score of 19th century NZ newspapers. Users may browse the
collection in English or in Maori.
http://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/
* The proceedings of the August workshop in Atlanta, "Managing Digital
Video Content" are now online. For most of the talks, the site includes
the speaker's PowerPoint presentation and a RealVideo clip of the talk.
http://www.vide.net/conferences/
* The proceedings of the October JISC seminar, Digital Curation: Digital
Archives, Libraries, and E-Science, are now online. These consist of a
couple of RTF documents and many PowerPoint presentations.
http://www.jisc.ac.uk/dner/preservation/digitalarchives.html
* The National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) has started compiling a
systematic collection of censorship incidents traceable to the patriotism
and counter-terrorism inspired by the September 11 attacks. The archive
has a section devoted to academic incidents, but the whole collection is
still very new and hasn't caught up with half the incidents I've read
about. I assume it will grow.
http://www.ncac.org/issues/freeex911.html
If you can't wait for the NCAC archive to grow, see the archive from EFF
mentioned in FOSN for 10/26/01. While the NCAC's collection covers all
kinds of anti-terrorist censorship, the EFF collection is limited to the
censorship of web sites.
http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Surveillance/Terrorism_militias/antiterrorism_chill.html
* SearchTool.com has put online Eric Lease Morgan's comparative review of
eight open source search engines, and links to 20 others.
http://www.searchtools.com/tools/tools-opensource.html
----------
Share your thoughts
* The National Academies' Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in the
Knowledge-Based Economy would like your comments on the papers from several
past conferences that it has posted to its web site.
http://ip.nationalacademies.org/ip-discuss/wwwthreads.pl?Cat=
* The American Library Association would like your nominations for the 2002
Library of the Future Award. The nomination deadline is December 1.
http://www.ala.org/work/awards/appls/lofappl.html
* The Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) would like your
nominations for its 2002 National Award for Library Service. It will
accept nominations until February 15.
http://www.imls.gov/grants/library/lib_nals.htm
* The IMLS would also like your comments on the following two reports, both
just put online.
Report of the IMLS Digital Library Forum on the National Science Digital
Library Program
http://www.imls.gov/pubs/natscidiglibrary.htm
A Framework of Guidance for Building Good Digital Collections
http://www.imls.gov/pubs/forumframework.htm
* The Trans European Telecommunications Networks is calling for proposals
in many areas, including "Access to Europe's Cultural Heritage".
http://www.ten-telecom.org/en/cfp20012.html
* Gerry Mckiernan would welcome any news about "current or planned efforts
for organizing or providing enhanced access to Internet or Web resources"
for his "News from the Field" column for the _Journal of Internet
Cataloging_ (JIC). Send news items to <gerrymck [at] iastate.edu>.
----------
In other publications
* In the November 6 _Chronicle of Higher Education_, Jeffrey Young
interviews Corynne McSherry, author of _Academic Work: Battling for
Control of Intellectual Property_ (Harvard UP, 2001). McSherry sees a deep
conflict between copyright law, which is about the exchange of commodities,
and academic life, which is about the exchange of gifts. Her book won
Harvard's 2001 Thomas J. Wilson prize for the best first book accepted this
year.
Jeffrey Young, Law Student Warns That Professors' Quest for Rights to
Lectures Could Backfire
http://chronicle.com/free/2001/11/2001110601t.htm
Corynne McSherry, _Academic Work_
http://www.hup.harvard.edu/pdf/MCSWHO.pdf
(This is the full-text of the book. Does anyone have details on when
Harvard provides free online full-text of its books and when it doesn't?)
* Lawrence Lessig has just published _The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the
Commons in a Connected World_ (Random House, October 30, 2001), a critique
of the direction of copyright law with specific recommendations on how
legislatures can protect the future of ideas.
Lessig, _The Future of Ideas_ (at Amazon)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N3E71222
Review by Marc Rotenberg (director of the Electronic Privacy Information
Center)
http://www.salon.com/tech/review/2001/11/07/lessig/index.html
* Rory Litwin, maintainer of the Library Juice weblog, has written a
manifesto that attempts to capture what he calls the Library
Spirit. Libraries' "combination of economic communitarianism and
social/intellectual libertarianism creates the ideal support system for a
democratic society, because the library provides everyone with access to
ideas and provides access to every idea."
Rory Litwin, The Ideology of Librarianship: A Libertarian Socialism of
Information
http://libr.org/Juice/manifesto.html
Library Juice
http://libr.org/Juice/index.html
* The text-e online seminar (see FOSN for 10/19/01) has moved on to the
discussion of an essay by Roberto Casati. Free registration allows you to
participate in the conversation.
Roberto Casati's essay, What the Internet Tells Us About the Real Nature of
the Book
http://www.text-e.org/conf/index.cfm?switchLang=Eng&ConfText_ID=6
Stevan Harnad's comments on Casati's essay
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Tp/casati.htm
----------
Following up
* The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the First Amendment Project
(FAP) have issued a joint press release on the California decision
vindicating DeCSS and declaring that source code is protected by the First
Amendment (see FOSN for 11/2/01). The press release was issued November 1,
but last week the link was dead.
http://www.eff.org/IP/Video/DVDCCA_case/20011101_eff_fap_bunner_pr.html
* More on the California DeCSS decision.
http://www.business2.com/articles/web/0,,35080,FF.html
* If you want to read more about taxonomy software than the short bit in
the last issue, see the articles collected on this SearchTools.com page
devoted to it.
http://www.searchtools.com/info/classifiers.html
* If you remember, in June the small ebook publisher Rosetta Books defeated
Random House in the Supreme Court and established the principle that
then-standard book contracts did not cover electronic publication. As a
result, Rosetta Books won the right to publish electronic versions of books
whose print versions were under contract to Random House. (See FOSN for
7/17/01.) Simon & Schuster shares Random House's interest in this case and
this week showed its solidarity by squelching a deal to distribute books
from a third firm, iBooks, when it found out that iBooks had struck a
co-publishing deal with Rosetta Books.
Hillel Italie, Simon & Schuster Helps Kill Deal
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A58179-2001Nov7.html
* If you were intrigued by R2 Consulting's dynamic map of the ebook
business (see FOSN for 8/23/01), then you'll be glad to know that software
for building your own dynamic knowledge maps is now available for the
desktop ($299 retail).
Star Tree mapping software from inxight
http://startree.inxight.com/
Example: R2 Consulting's map of the ebook business (using inxight software)
http://www.ebookmap.net/maps.htm
* In the last issue, I reviewed the background of Eddy van der Maarel's
resignation from _Vegetatio_ in order to launch the _Journal of Vegetative
Science_ (JVS). At the time I mailed the issue, his editorial in JVS 1.1,
explaining the background in his own words was only accessible online to
paying subscribers. Now Opulus Press has made it freely available. Thank
you, Opulus Press.
http://www.opuluspress.se/pub/1.001-4.pdf
----------
Catching up
* "Remote User Authentication in Libraries" is a very good annotated list
of relevant web resources. The list is thorough and the annotations are
helpful.
http://library.smc.edu/rpa.htm
* Since 1998, the Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (CDLI) has been hard
at work. It is scanning clay tablets, on each of their six faces, and
putting the digital images online for students and scholars. In the next
few years CDLI will contain scans of 60,000 clay tablets, with special
strength in the period 3200-2000 BCE. Over time it plans to capture the
200,000 known tablets housed in museums throughout the world. CDLI will
revolutionize Assyriology, whose scholars have had to travel from museum to
museum to read the physical tablets, or from library to library to read the
40,000 images already published in books and journals. The CDLI is a joint
venture of the University of California at Los Angeles and the Max Planck
Institute for the History of Science, and has received funding from the NSF
and NEH.
CDLI
http://early-cuneiform.humnet.ucla.edu/
Scott McLemee's description of CDLI
http://chronicle.com/weekly/v48/i11/11a01401.htm
----------
Conferences
If you plan to attend one of the following conferences, please share your
observations with us through our discussion forum.
* Conference on the Public Domain
http://www.law.duke.edu/pd/
Duke Law School, November 9-11
* Setting Standards and Making it Real (on Digital Reference Services)
http://vrd.org/conferences/VRD2001/program.shtml
Orlando, November 12-13
* The Future of Intellectual Property in the Information Age
http://www.cato.org/events/futureip/program.html
Washington, D.C., November 14
* Digitising Maps and Atlases: Experiences and Techniques
http://www.bncf.firenze.sbn.it/notizie/index3.html
Florence, November 15
* First Annual Meeting of the Text Encoding Initiative Consortium
http://www.tei-c.org/Publicity/pisa.html
Pisa, November 16-17
* British Library and BioMed Central Open Access Forum
http://bubl.ac.uk/news/events/ev102403.htm
London, November 19
* NINCH Town Meeting: Copyright and Fair use: Creating Policy
http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~jqj/ninch/
Eugene, November 19
* ARL Workshop for Publishers: Licensing Electronic Resources to
Libraries: Understanding Your Market
http://www.arl.org/scomm/licensing/pworkshop.html
Philadelphia, November 19
* Electronic Journals within Art & Design: Flash in the Pan or Here to Stay?
http://bubl.ac.uk/news/events/ev102602.htm
Northampton, November 21
* A Day in the Life of a Journal Publisher
http://bubl.ac.uk/news/events/ev102404.htm
Bradford, England, November 22
* Eighth Call for Proposals of the European IST Programme
http://www.ukishelp.co.uk/ukishelp/SI12254ku/system/Viewfull.cfm?ObjectID=318&Order=Current
London, November 27
* European Forum on Harmful and Illegal Cyber Content
http://www.humanrights.coe.int/media/cyberforum/main.htm
Strasbourg, November 28
* Canadian Digital Library Symposium
http://www.digital-libraries.net/conf2001/program.html
Toronto, November 28-29
* Fall 2001 CNI Task Force Meeting
http://www.cni.org/tfms/2001b.fall/
San Antonio, November 29-30
* eGovernment [in Europe]: From Policy to Practice
http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/egovconf/index_en.htm
Brussels, November 29-30
* Digital Media Revolution in the Americas
http://www.iamericas.org/events/eventlist.html
Pasadena, November 29 - December 1
* Fourth SCHEMAS Workshop: Sharing [metadata] schemas
http://www.schemas-forum.org/workshops/
The Hague, November 30
* 2001 IST Exhibition and Awards
http://europa.eu.int/information_society/newsroom/istevent/programme/index_en.htm
Düsseldorf, December 3
* School for Scanning: Creating, Managing, and Preserving Digital Assets
http://www.nedcc.org/sfsfl1.htm
Delray Beach, Florida, December 3-5
* Online Information 2001
http://www.online-information.co.uk/online/
London, December 4-6
* Second Meeting of the Centre for Educational Technology Interoperability
Standards (CETIS) Educational Content Special Interest Group (EC SIG)
http://www.cetis.ac.uk/groups/20010809144711/viewGroup
Luton, December 7
* The Electronic Library: Strategic, Policy and Management Issues
http://www.britishcouncil.org/networkevents/2000/0134p.htm
Loughborough, December 9-14
* 4th International Conference of Asian Digital Libraries
http://www.icadl2001.org/
Bangalore, December 10-12
* Academic Institutions Transforming Scholarly Communications (SPARC/ARL
Forum at the ALA Midwinter Meeting)
http://www.ala.org/events/midwinter2002/
New Orleans, January 18-23
----------
The Free Online Scholarship Newsletter is supported by a grant from the
Open Society Institute.
http://www.osi.hu/infoprogram/
==========
This is the Free Online Scholarship Newsletter (ISSN 1535-7848).
Please feel free to forward any issue of the newsletter to interested
colleagues. If you are reading a forwarded copy of this issue, you may
subscribe by signing up at the FOS home page or the FOS Newsletter page.
FOS home page, general information, subscriptions, editorial position,
feedback form
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/index.htm
FOS Newsletter, subscriptions, back issues
http://www.topica.com/lists/suber-fos
FOS Discussion Forum, subscriptions, postings
http://www.topica.com/lists/fos-forum
Guide to the FOS Movement
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/guide.htm
Peter Suber
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters
Copyright (c) 2001, Peter Suber
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/copyrite.htm
** If you receive this newsletter by email, then please delete the "easy
unsubscribe" footer (below) before forwarding it to friends or
colleagues. It contains a code identifying you as the original recipient
of the email. If someone down the forwarding chain clicks on the
unsubscribe link, then you will be unsubscribed. **
|
|
 |
|
